% Generated by roxygen2: do not edit by hand % Please edit documentation in R/weighted_posteriors.R \name{weighted_posteriors} \alias{weighted_posteriors} \alias{weighted_posteriors.data.frame} \alias{weighted_posteriors.stanreg} \alias{weighted_posteriors.brmsfit} \alias{weighted_posteriors.BFBayesFactor} \title{Generate posterior distributions weighted across models} \usage{ weighted_posteriors(..., prior_odds = NULL, missing = 0, verbose = TRUE) \method{weighted_posteriors}{data.frame}(..., prior_odds = NULL, missing = 0, verbose = TRUE) \method{weighted_posteriors}{stanreg}( ..., prior_odds = NULL, missing = 0, verbose = TRUE, effects = c("fixed", "random", "all"), component = c("conditional", "zi", "zero_inflated", "all"), parameters = NULL ) \method{weighted_posteriors}{brmsfit}( ..., prior_odds = NULL, missing = 0, verbose = TRUE, effects = c("fixed", "random", "all"), component = c("conditional", "zi", "zero_inflated", "all"), parameters = NULL ) \method{weighted_posteriors}{BFBayesFactor}( ..., prior_odds = NULL, missing = 0, verbose = TRUE, iterations = 4000 ) } \arguments{ \item{...}{Fitted models (see details), all fit on the same data, or a single \code{BFBayesFactor} object (see 'Details').} \item{prior_odds}{Optional vector of prior odds for the models compared to the first model (or the denominator, for \code{BFBayesFactor} objects). For \code{data.frame}s, this will be used as the basis of weighting.} \item{missing}{An optional numeric value to use if a model does not contain a parameter that appears in other models. Defaults to 0.} \item{verbose}{Toggle off warnings.} \item{effects}{Should results for fixed effects, random effects or both be returned? Only applies to mixed models. May be abbreviated.} \item{component}{Should results for all parameters, parameters for the conditional model or the zero-inflated part of the model be returned? May be abbreviated. Only applies to \pkg{brms}-models.} \item{parameters}{Regular expression pattern that describes the parameters that should be returned. Meta-parameters (like \code{lp__} or \code{prior_}) are filtered by default, so only parameters that typically appear in the \code{summary()} are returned. Use \code{parameters} to select specific parameters for the output.} \item{iterations}{For \code{BayesFactor} models, how many posterior samples to draw.} } \value{ A data frame with posterior distributions (weighted across models) . } \description{ Extract posterior samples of parameters, weighted across models. Weighting is done by comparing posterior model probabilities, via \code{\link{bayesfactor_models}}. } \details{ Note that across models some parameters might play different roles. For example, the parameter \code{A} plays a different role in the model \code{Y ~ A + B} (where it is a main effect) than it does in the model \code{Y ~ A + B + A:B} (where it is a simple effect). In many cases centering of predictors (mean subtracting for continuous variables, and effects coding via \code{contr.sum} or orthonormal coding via {\code{\link{contr.bayes}}} for factors) can reduce this issue. In any case you should be mindful of this issue. \cr\cr See \code{\link{bayesfactor_models}} details for more info on passed models. \cr\cr Note that for \code{BayesFactor} models, posterior samples cannot be generated from intercept only models. \cr\cr This function is similar in function to \code{brms::posterior_average}. } \examples{ \donttest{ if (require("rstanarm") && require("see")) { stan_m0 <- stan_glm(extra ~ 1, data = sleep, family = gaussian(), refresh=0, diagnostic_file = file.path(tempdir(), "df0.csv")) stan_m1 <- stan_glm(extra ~ group, data = sleep, family = gaussian(), refresh=0, diagnostic_file = file.path(tempdir(), "df1.csv")) res <- weighted_posteriors(stan_m0, stan_m1) plot(eti(res)) } ## With BayesFactor if (require("BayesFactor")) { extra_sleep <- ttestBF(formula = extra ~ group, data = sleep) wp <- weighted_posteriors(extra_sleep) describe_posterior(extra_sleep, test = NULL) describe_posterior(wp$delta, test = NULL) # also considers the null } ## weighted prediction distributions via data.frames if (require("rstanarm")) { m0 <- stan_glm( mpg ~ 1, data = mtcars, family = gaussian(), diagnostic_file = file.path(tempdir(), "df0.csv"), refresh = 0 ) m1 <- stan_glm( mpg ~ carb, data = mtcars, family = gaussian(), diagnostic_file = file.path(tempdir(), "df1.csv"), refresh = 0 ) # Predictions: pred_m0 <- data.frame(posterior_predict(m0)) pred_m1 <- data.frame(posterior_predict(m1)) BFmods <- bayesfactor_models(m0, m1) wp <- weighted_posteriors(pred_m0, pred_m1, prior_odds = BFmods$BF[2]) # look at first 5 prediction intervals hdi(pred_m0[1:5]) hdi(pred_m1[1:5]) hdi(wp[1:5]) # between, but closer to pred_m1 } } } \references{ \itemize{ \item Clyde, M., Desimone, H., & Parmigiani, G. (1996). Prediction via orthogonalized model mixing. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91(435), 1197-1208. \item Hinne, M., Gronau, Q. F., van den Bergh, D., and Wagenmakers, E. (2019, March 25). A conceptual introduction to Bayesian Model Averaging. \doi{10.31234/osf.io/wgb64} \item Rouder, J. N., Haaf, J. M., & Vandekerckhove, J. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology, part IV: Parameter estimation and Bayes factors. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 25(1), 102-113. \item van den Bergh, D., Haaf, J. M., Ly, A., Rouder, J. N., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2019). A cautionary note on estimating effect size. } } \seealso{ \code{\link{bayesfactor_inclusion}} for Bayesian model averaging. }