Database migration: update table TRM_CODESYSTEM_VER drop column RES_VERSION_ID; drop constraint IDX_CSV_RESOURCEPID_AND_VER from table TRM_CODESYSTEM_VER TODO: In answer lists, figure out what to do with externally defined lists Comments for Loinc: Overall - ValueSet and ConceptMap resources have a spot for copyright and contact information. Are there official values for these? Answer Lists - Per the notes, there is no way in FHIR currently to map answer lists to codes based on context. For this reason, I am ignoring any entries in LoincAnswerListLink_Beta_1.csv where the "ApplicableContext" context is not empty. Is this correct? Parts - Only parts with a status of "ACTIVE" are being imported, any others are ignored. - The PartTypeName (e.g. "ADJUSTMENT") is ignored as there is no corresponding property in loinc.xml - PartDisplayName is not mapped - Part links are not currently processed (it's not clear to me how to model these in FHIR, as CodeSystem.hierarchyMeaning has to be only one of 'is-a' or 'part-of' and presumably the 'is-a' relationship is more important. Part Mappings - I have made LOINC the source and SCT the target for the mappings in the ConceptMap resource. Does this seem like the appropriate orientation? - A canonical URI should be defined for the LOINC->SCT mapping ConceptMap resource. I have hardcoded "http://loinc.org/loinc-to-snomed" for now, but we should discuss what is appropriate. RSNA Playbook - A canonical URI should be defined for the "all RSNA playbook codes" ValueSet. I have hardcoded "http://loinc.org/rsna-codes" for now but we should discuss what is appropriate. - A name for the "RSNA Playbook" ValueSet is needed. - Just to confirm, the "all RSNA playbook codes" ValueSet should contain the loinc codes (e.g. "17787-3") and not the part codes (e.g. "LP199995-4")? - A codesystem URI for radlex RID and RPID codes is needed (currently "http://rid" and "http://rpid" are used as placeholders since I'm assuming these exist somewhere. - For mappings from loinc part codes to RadLex RIDs, are the codes considered equivalent (or would they be wider/narrower). They look equivalent to me. Document Ontology - Per the SOW, "A value set containing terms in the LOINC Document Ontology will be created". Just to confirm, entries in this ValueSet are therefore LOINC terms (such as "11488-4 / Consultation Note") as opposed to part codes? - Need to define a URI for the document ontology ValueSet. Currently I am using "http://loinc.org/document-ontology-codes" Top 2000 - Need to define a URI for both ValueSets. Currently I am using "http://loinc.org/top-2000-lab-results-us" and "http://loinc.org/top-2000-lab-results-si" Universal Order Set - Need to define a URI for this ValueSet - Currenty using "http://loinc.org/fhir/loinc-universal-order-set"