HEAD | 6e1e20f | DOC: reference psweep in batch docs | 30 July 2024, 22:16:11 UTC |
refs/heads/gh-pages | 6b9ae20 | deploy: 6e1e20f0d039c4837d40de12063fc447714fdbb9 | 30 July 2024, 22:23:42 UTC |
refs/heads/master | 6e1e20f | DOC: reference psweep in batch docs | 30 July 2024, 22:16:11 UTC |
refs/heads/python2.7-eol | 4e3df3a | INT: update date in LICENSE | 16 February 2018, 22:00:16 UTC |
refs/tags/1.0.0 | cbbc43f | MNT: num.poly_powers(): use list(itertools.product(...)) | 03 March 2020, 20:10:46 UTC |
refs/tags/1.1.0 | cc5e3d0 | MNT: mpl: handle matplotlib deprecation Use plt.subplots() instead of the old fig = plt.figure() ax = fig.add_subplot(111) Solves: MatplotlibDeprecationWarning: Adding an axes using the same arguments as a previous axes currently reuses the earlier instance. In a future version, a new instance will always be created and returned. Meanwhile, this warning can be suppressed, and the future behavior ensured, by passing a unique label to each axes instance. ax = fig.add_subplot(111) However, matplotlib doesn't complain when we use the old-ish style in fig_ax3d() so don't change that. | 29 March 2020, 23:05:50 UTC |
refs/tags/1.2.0 | c32a85a | REL: bump version | 16 July 2020, 23:09:28 UTC |
refs/tags/1.2.1 | 344cd1e | REL: bump version | 20 September 2020, 20:46:25 UTC |
refs/tags/1.2.2 | 73dae4a | REL: bump version | 21 May 2021, 09:48:15 UTC |
refs/tags/1.2.3 | 419c668 | REL: bump version to 1.2.3 | 28 October 2021, 21:54:31 UTC |
refs/tags/1.3.0 | 49c994a | REL: bump version 1.2.3 -> 1.3.0 | 29 July 2024, 20:43:49 UTC |