Skip to main content

Browse the archive

https://github.com/hrwakeford/ExoTiC-ISM
12 April 2023, 13:29:23 UTC
Raw File
Tip revision: 9adbaff947473181fb840a5bda229511bde014b8 authored by Hannah Wakeford on 02 February 2022, 16:48:20 UTC
Merge pull request #127 from hrwakeford/Webb_LD1
Tip revision: 9adbaff
report_template.html 
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
    <header lang="en">
        
        <title> Report page ExoTiC-ISM </title>
        
    </header>
    
    
    <body>
        
        <h1> Report page ExoTIC-ISM </h1>
        
        <h2> {{ data_file }} - {{ run_name }} </h2>
        
            <h3> Input parameters: </h3>
            <p>
            Number of systematic models: {{ nsys }}<br>
            Wavelength mid point = {{ wavelength_mid_point }}<br>
            Wavelength half width = {{ wavelength_half_width }}
            </p>
            
            <p>
            <h5> Planet parameters: </h5>
            Rp/R* = {{ rl_in }}<br>
            Epoch (MJD) = {{ epoch_in }}<br>
            Inclination (deg) = {{ incl_deg_in }}<br>
            Eccentricity = {{ ecc_in }}<br>
            Omega (deg) = {{ omega_in }}<br>
            Period (days) = {{ period_in }}<br>
            a/R* = {{ aor_in }}
            
            <h5> Stellar parameters:</h5>
            FeH (dex) = {{ metallicity }}<br>
            Teff (K) = {{ teff_in }}<br>
            log(g) (cgs) = {{ logg_in }}<br>
            </p>
            
            <h3> Output parameters: </h3>
            <h5> Limb-darkening coefficients: </h5>
            <p>
            C1 = {{ c1 }}<br>
            C2 = {{ c2 }}<br>
            C3 = {{ c3 }}<br>
            C4 = {{ c4 }}
            </p>
            
            <h5> Top five systematic models by their weight </h5>
            <p>
            Check the chi-squared values and the AIC evidence for reasonable fits. <br> 
            If the chi-squared values far exceed the DOF then it is likely that the input data contains additional noise, double check the spectral extraction. <br>
            Model numbers = {{ top_five_numbers }}<br>
            DOF = {{ top_five_dof }}<br>
            Chi-squared = {{ top_five_chisq }}<br>
            AIC evidence = {{ top_five_aicevidence}}<br>
            Weights = {{ top_five_weights }}<br>
            SDNR = {{ top_five_sdnr }}<br>
            <br>
            <h5> Top model Noise Statistics: </h5>
            White noise = {{ white_noise }}<br>
            Red noise = {{ red_noise }}<br>
            Beta = {{ beta }} <br>
            If the red-noise is significant it means the data is poorly fit by any of the systematic models. It is recommended that the input lightcurves are checked for additional noise sources.
            </p>
            
            <h3> Marginalised parameters: </h3>
<!--             <p>
            {{ num_rejected }} models do not satisfy the AIC evidence condition and were removed
            from the marginalisation. Their model numbers are (numbering starts at 0):<br>
            {{ indices_rejected }}
            </p> -->
            
            <p>
            If None, parameter was not fit for.<br>
            <br>
            Rp/R* = {{ rl_marg }} +/- {{ rl_marg_err }}<br>
            Epoch (MJD) = {{ epoch_marg }} +/- {{ epoch_marg_err }}<br>
            Inclination (rad) = {{ inclin_rad_marg }} +/- {{ inclin_rad_marg_err }}<br>
            Inclination (deg) = {{ inclin_deg_marg }} +/- {{ inclin_deg_marg_err }}<br>
            System density (Ms+Mp/R^3) = {{ msmpr_marg }} +/- {{ msmpr_marg_err }}<br>
            a/R* = {{ aor_marg }} +/- {{ aor_marg_err }}<br>
            </p>
            
            <h3> Systematics </h3>
            
            <p>
            <img src="{{ systematics_figure }}" alt="systematics" width="900" height="650"><br>
            <br>
            <i>Top:</i> Evidence-based weight associated with each systematic model when fit with the data.
                <i>Middle:</i> Standard deviation of the residuals after correcting for each systematic model.
                <i>Bottom:</i> Radius ratio measured from the transit depth when the light curve has been corrected
                using each systematic model. <i>If present, grey crosses mark discarded systematic models (poor AIC evidence).</i>
            </p>
            
            <h3> Lightcurves </h3>
            
            <p>
            <img src="{{ lightcurve_figure }}" alt="lightcurve" width="900" height="650"><br>
            <br>
                <i>Top:</i> Input lightcurve with no systematic model correction applied.
                <i>Middle:</i> Lightcurve corrected by highest weight systematic model plotted with the smooth
                planetary transit model centred on the mid-transit time.
                <i>Bottom:</i> Residuals and uncertainties associated with the middle panel lightcurve. The upper and
                lower standard deviation bounds are shown in dotted lines relative to zero.
            </p>
        
    </body>
</html>
back to top