https://github.com/cran/Epi
Tip revision: 69081fbfb64fb07808d3b5d02c0901fb07cedf74 authored by Bendix Carstensen on 10 February 2019, 14:13:15 UTC
version 2.34
version 2.34
Tip revision: 69081fb
erl.Rd
\name{erl}
\alias{surv1}
\alias{surv2}
\alias{erl1}
\alias{erl}
\alias{yll}
\title{Compute survival functions from rates and expected residual
lifetime in an illness-death model as well as years of life lost to disease.
}
\description{
These functions compute survival functions from a set of mortality and
disease incidence rates in an illness-death model. Expected residual
life time can be computed under various scenarios by the \code{erl}
function, and areas between survival functions can be computed under
various scenarios by the \code{yll} function. Rates are assumed
supplied for equidistant intervals of length \code{int}.
}
\usage{
surv1( int, mu , age.in = 0, A = NULL )
erl1( int, mu , age.in = 0 )
surv2( int, muW, muD, lam, age.in = 0, A = NULL )
erl( int, muW, muD, lam=NULL, age.in = 0, A = NULL,
immune = is.null(lam), yll=TRUE, note=TRUE )
yll( int, muW, muD, lam=NULL, age.in = 0, A = NULL,
immune = is.null(lam), note=TRUE )
}
\arguments{
\item{int}{
Scalar. Length of intervals that rates refer to.
}
\item{mu}{
Numeric vector of mortality rates at midpoints of intervals of length \code{int}
}
\item{muW}{
Numeric vector of mortality rates among persons in the "Well" state at
midpoints of intervals of length \code{int}. Left endpoint of first
interval is \code{age.in}.
}
\item{muD}{
Numeric vector of mortality rates among persons in the "Diseased" state
at midpoints of intervals of length \code{int}. Left endpoint of first
interval is \code{age.in}.
}
\item{lam}{
Numeric vector of disease incidence rates among persons in the "Well" state
at midpoints of intervals of length \code{int}. Left endpoint of first
interval is \code{age.in}.
}
\item{age.in}{
Scalar indicating the age at the left endpoint of the first interval.
}
\item{A}{
Numeric vector of conditioning ages for calculation of survival
functions.
}
\item{immune}{
Logical. Should the years of life lost to the disease be computed
using assumptions that non-diseased individuals are immune to the
disease (\code{lam}=0) and that their mortality is yet still \code{muW}.
}
\item{note}{
Logical. Should a warning of silly assumptions be printed?
}
\item{yll}{
Logical. Should years of life lost be included in the result?
}
}
\details{
The mortality rates given are supposed to refer to the ages
\code{age.in+(i-1/2)*int}, \code{i=1,2,3,...}.
The units in which \code{int} is given must correspond to the units in
which the rates \code{mu}, \code{muW}, \code{muD} and \code{lam} are
given. Thus if \code{int} is given in years, the rates must be given
in the unit of events per year.
The ages in which the survival curves are computed are from
\code{age.in} and then at the end of \code{length(muW)}
(\code{length(mu)}) intervals each of length \code{int}.
The \code{age.in} argument is merely a device to account for rates
only available from a given age. It has two effects, one is that
labeling of the interval endpoint is offset by this quantity, thus
starting at \code{age.in}, and the other that the conditioning ages
given in the argument \code{A} will refer to the ages defined by this.
The \code{immune} argument is \code{FALSE} whenever the disease
incidence rates are supplied. If set to \code{TRUE}, the years of life
lost is computed under the assumption that individuals without the
disease at a given age are immune to the disease in the sense that the
disease incidence rate is 0, so transitions to the diseased state
(with presumably higher mortality rates) are assumed not to
occur. This is a slightly peculiar assumption (but presumably the most
used in the epidemiological literature) and the resulting object is
therefore given an attribute, \code{NOTE}, that point this out.
If however \code{muW} is the total mortality in the population
(including the diseased) the result is a good approximation to the
correct YLL.
The default of the \code{surv2} function is to take the possibility of
disease into account.}
\value{\code{surv1} and \code{surv2} return a matrix whose first column
is the ages at the ends of the
intervals, thus with \code{length(mu)+1} rows. The following columns
are the survival functions (since \code{age.in}), and conditional on
survival till ages as indicated in \code{A}, thus a matrix with
\code{length(A)+2} columns. Columns are labeled with the actual
conditioning ages; if \code{A} contains values that are not among the
endpoints of the intervals used, the nearest smaller interval border
is used as conditioning age, and columns are named accordingly.
\code{surv1} returns the survival function for a simple model with one
type of death, occurring at intensity \code{mu}.
\code{surv2} returns the survival function for a person in the "Well"
state of an illness-death model, taking into account that the person
may move to the "Diseased" state, thus requiring all three transition
rates to be specified. The conditional survival functions are
conditional on being in the "Well" state at ages given in \code{A}.
\code{erl1} returns a three column matrix with columns \code{age},
\code{surv} (survival function) and \code{erl} (expected residual life
time) with \code{length(mu)+1} rows.
\code{erl} returns a two column matrix, columns labeled "Well" and
"Dis", and with row-labels \code{A}. The entries are the expected
residual life times given survival to \code{A}. If \code{yll=TRUE} the
difference between the columns is added as a
third column, labeled "YLL".
}
\author{Bendix Carstensen, \email{b@bxc.dk}
}
\seealso{
\code{\link{ci.cum}}
}
\examples{
library( Epi )
data( DMlate )
# Naive Lexis object
Lx <- Lexis( entry = list( age = dodm-dobth ),
exit = list( age = dox -dobth ),
exit.status = factor( !is.na(dodth), labels=c("DM","Dead") ),
data = DMlate )
# Cut follow-up at insulin inception
Lc <- cutLexis( Lx, cut = Lx$doins-Lx$dob,
new.state = "DM/ins",
precursor.states = "DM" )
summary( Lc )
# Split in small age intervals
Sc <- splitLexis( Lc, breaks=seq(0,120,2) )
summary( Sc )
# Overview of object
boxes( Sc, boxpos=TRUE, show.BE=TRUE, scale.R=100 )
# Knots for splines
a.kn <- 2:9*10
# Mortality among DM
mW <- glm( lex.Xst=="Dead" ~ Ns( age, knots=a.kn ),
offset = log(lex.dur),
family = poisson,
data = subset(Sc,lex.Cst=="DM") )
# Mortality among insulin treated
mI <- update( mW, data = subset(Sc,lex.Cst=="DM/ins") )
# Total motality
mT <- update( mW, data = Sc )
# Incidence of insulin inception
lI <- update( mW, lex.Xst=="DM/ins" ~ . )
# From these we can now derive the fitted rates in intervals of 1 year's
# length. In real applications you would use much smaller interval like
# 1 month:
# int <- 1/12
int <- 1
# Prediction frame to return rates in units of cases per 1 year
# - we start at age 40 since rates of insulin inception are largely
# indeterminate before age 40
nd <- data.frame( age = seq( 40+int, 110, int ) - int/2,
lex.dur = 1 )
muW <- predict( mW, newdata = nd, type = "response" )
muD <- predict( mI, newdata = nd, type = "response" )
lam <- predict( lI, newdata = nd, type = "response" )
# Compute the survival function, and the conditional from ages 50 resp. 70
s1 <- surv1( int, muD, age.in=40, A=c(50,70) )
round( s1, 3 )
s2 <- surv2( int, muW, muD, lam, age.in=40, A=c(50,70) )
round( s2, 3 )
# How much is YLL overrated by ignoring insulin incidence?
round( YLL <- cbind(
yll( int, muW, muD, lam, A = 41:90, age.in = 40 ),
yll( int, muW, muD, lam, A = 41:90, age.in = 40, immune=TRUE ) ), 2 )[seq(1,51,10),]
par( mar=c(3,3,1,1), mgp=c(3,1,0)/1.6, bty="n", las=1 )
matplot( 40:90, YLL,
type="l", lty=1, lwd=3,
ylim=c(0,10), yaxs="i", xlab="Age" )
}
\keyword{survival}