https://github.com/cran/spatstat
Tip revision: 28f4ee9e406fce786bb126198f84ce6ec43cb9c1 authored by Adrian Baddeley on 10 February 2011, 00:00:00 UTC
version 1.21-5.1
version 1.21-5.1
Tip revision: 28f4ee9
density.ppp.Rd
\name{density.ppp}
\alias{density.ppp}
\title{Kernel Smoothed Intensity of Point Pattern}
\description{
Compute a kernel smoothed intensity function from a point pattern.
}
\usage{
\method{density}{ppp}(x, sigma, \dots,
weights, edge=TRUE, varcov=NULL,
at="pixels", leaveoneout=TRUE)
}
\arguments{
\item{x}{
Point pattern (object of class \code{"ppp"}).
}
\item{sigma}{
Standard deviation of isotropic Gaussian smoothing kernel.
}
\item{weights}{
Optional vector of weights to be attached to the points.
May include negative values.
}
\item{\dots}{
Arguments passed to \code{\link{as.mask}} to determine
the pixel resolution.
}
\item{edge}{
Logical flag: if \code{TRUE}, apply edge correction.
}
\item{varcov}{
Variance-covariance matrix of anisotropic Gaussian kernel.
Incompatible with \code{sigma}.
}
\item{at}{
String specifying whether to compute the intensity values
at a grid of pixel locations (\code{at="pixels"}) or
only at the points of \code{x} (\code{at="points"}).
}
\item{leaveoneout}{
Logical value indicating whether to compute a leave-one-out
estimator. Applicable only when \code{at="points"}.
}
}
\value{
By default, the result is
a pixel image (object of class \code{"im"}).
Pixel values are estimated intensity values,
expressed in \dQuote{points per unit area}.
If \code{at="points"}, the result is a numeric vector
of length equal to the number of points in \code{x}.
Values are estimated intensity values at the points of \code{x}.
In either case, the return value has attributes
\code{"sigma"} and \code{"varcov"} which report the smoothing
bandwidth that was used.
}
\details{
This is a method for the generic function \code{density}.
It computes a fixed-bandwidth kernel estimate
(Diggle, 1985) of the intensity function of the point process
that generated the point pattern \code{x}.
By default it computes the convolution of the
isotropic Gaussian kernel of standard deviation \code{sigma}
with point masses at each of the data points in \code{x}.
Each point has unit weight, unless the argument \code{weights} is
given (it should be a numeric vector; weights can be negative or zero).
If \code{edge=TRUE}, the intensity estimate is corrected for
edge effect bias by dividing it by the convolution of the
Gaussian kernel with the window of observation.
Instead of the isotropic Gaussian kernel with standard deviation
\code{sigma}, the smoothing kernel may be chosen to be any Gaussian
kernel, by giving the variance-covariance matrix \code{varcov}.
The arguments \code{sigma} and \code{varcov} are incompatible.
Also \code{sigma} may be a vector of length 2 giving the
standard deviations of two independent Gaussian coordinates,
thus equivalent to \code{varcov = diag(sigma^2)}.
Thus the intensity value at a point \eqn{u} is
\deqn{
\hat\lambda(u) = e(u) \sum_i k(x_i - u) w_i
}{
lambda(u) = e(u) sum[i] k(x[i] - u) w[i]
}
where \eqn{k} is the Gaussian smoothing kernel,
\eqn{e(u)} is an edge correction factor,
and \eqn{x_i}{w[i]} are the weights.
By default the intensity values are
computed at every location \eqn{u} in a fine grid,
and are returned as a pixel image.
Computation is performed using the Fast Fourier Transform.
Accuracy depends on the pixel resolution, controlled by the arguments
\code{\dots} passed to \code{\link{as.mask}}.
If \code{at="points"}, the intensity values are computed
to high accuracy at the points of \code{x} only. Computation is
performed by directly evaluating and summing the Gaussian kernel
contributions without discretising the data. The result is a numeric
vector giving the density values.
The intensity value at a point \eqn{x_i}{x[i]} is
\deqn{
\hat\lambda(x_i) = e(x_i) \sum_j k(x_j - x_i) w_i
}{
lambda(x[i]) = e(x[i]) sum[j] k(x[j] - x[i]) w[i]
}
If \code{leaveoneout=TRUE} (the default), then the sum in the equation
is taken over all \eqn{j} not equal to \eqn{i},
so that the intensity value at a
data point is the sum of kernel contributions from
all \emph{other} data points.
If \code{leaveoneout=FALSE} then the sum is taken over all \eqn{j},
so that the intensity value at a data point includes a contribution
from the same point.
To perform spatial interpolation of values that were observed
at the points of a point pattern, use \code{\link{smooth.ppp}}.
For adaptive nonparametric estimation, see
\code{\link{adaptive.density}}.
For data sharpening, see \code{\link{sharpen.ppp}}.
}
\seealso{
\code{\link{smooth.ppp}},
\code{\link{sharpen.ppp}},
\code{\link{adaptive.density}},
\code{\link{ppp.object}},
\code{\link{im.object}}
}
\note{
This function is often misunderstood.
The result of \code{density.ppp} is not a spatial smoothing
of the marks or weights attached to the point pattern.
To perform spatial interpolation of values that were observed
at the points of a point pattern, use \code{\link{smooth.ppp}}.
The result of \code{density.ppp} is not a probability density.
It is an estimate of the \emph{intensity function} of the
point process that generated the point pattern data.
Intensity is the expected number of random points
per unit area.
The units of intensity are \dQuote{points per unit area}.
Intensity is usually a function of spatial location,
and it is this function which is estimated by \code{density.ppp}.
The integral of the intensity function over a spatial region gives the
expected number of points falling in this region.
Inspecting an estimate of the intensity function is usually the
first step in exploring a spatial point pattern dataset.
For more explanation, see the workshop notes (Baddeley, 2008)
or Diggle (2003).
}
\examples{
data(cells)
Z <- density(cells, 0.05)
plot(Z)
density(cells, 0.05, at="points")
}
\references{
Baddeley, A. (2008) Analysing spatial point patterns in R.
Workshop notes. CSIRO online technical publication.
URL: \code{www.csiro.au/resources/pf16h.html}
Diggle, P.J. (1985)
A kernel method for smoothing point process data.
\emph{Applied Statistics} (Journal of the Royal Statistical Society,
Series C) \bold{34} (1985) 138--147.
Diggle, P.J. (2003)
\emph{Statistical analysis of spatial point patterns},
Second edition. Arnold.
}
\author{Adrian Baddeley
\email{Adrian.Baddeley@csiro.au}
\url{http://www.maths.uwa.edu.au/~adrian/}
and Rolf Turner
\email{r.turner@auckland.ac.nz}
}
\keyword{spatial}
\keyword{methods}
\keyword{smooth}