https://github.com/ElsevierSoftwareX/SOFTX_2019_219
Tip revision: 23801a03e63804d9d099c644e2c2fe4945d6d06b authored by Konrad Werys on 30 July 2019, 11:59:42 UTC
fix: codecov reports
fix: codecov reports
Tip revision: 23801a0
notepad.md
# Different results from the configurations:
parameter_to_map: T1_SHMOLLI
functions_type: **FunctionsBasic/FunctionsShmolli**
fitting_method: LevMarVnl
max_function_evals: 4000
fTolerance: 1e-12
sign_calc_method: MagPhase
start_point_calc_method: Default
FunctionsBasic: 10s and seemingly correct results
FunctionsShmolli: 2.2s and wrong results
parameter_to_map: T1_SHMOLLI
functions_type: FunctionsShmolli
fitting_method: LevMarVnl
max_function_evals: 4000
fTolerance: 1e-12
sign_calc_method: MagPhase
start_point_calc_method: **Default/StartPointSHMOLLI**
Default: 2.2s and wrong results
StartPointSHMOLLI: 10s and seemingly correct results
# 5 vs 7 samples
5 samples are calculated way slower. Maybe playing with fmax and maxIter would reduce the time?