https://github.com/epiqc/ScaffCC
Raw File
Tip revision: 861c8b60980b0f4d36b101b45346a2e64b0fa390 authored by Pranav Gokhale on 05 February 2018, 05:29:11 UTC
update documentation and release notes
Tip revision: 861c8b6
Passes.html
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"
                      "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
<html>
<head>
  <title>LLVM's Analysis and Transform Passes</title>
  <link rel="stylesheet" href="llvm.css" type="text/css">
  <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>

<!--

If Passes.html is up to date, the following "one-liner" should print
an empty diff.

egrep -e '^<tr><td><a href="#.*">-.*</a></td><td>.*</td></tr>$' \
      -e '^  <a name=".*">.*</a>$' < Passes.html >html; \
perl >help <<'EOT' && diff -u help html; rm -f help html
open HTML, "<Passes.html" or die "open: Passes.html: $!\n";
while (<HTML>) {
  m:^<tr><td><a href="#(.*)">-.*</a></td><td>.*</td></tr>$: or next;
  $order{$1} = sprintf("%03d", 1 + int %order);
}
open HELP, "../Release/bin/opt -help|" or die "open: opt -help: $!\n";
while (<HELP>) {
  m:^    -([^ ]+) +- (.*)$: or next;
  my $o = $order{$1};
  $o = "000" unless defined $o;
  push @x, "$o<tr><td><a href=\"#$1\">-$1</a></td><td>$2</td></tr>\n";
  push @y, "$o  <a name=\"$1\">-$1: $2</a>\n";
}
@x = map { s/^\d\d\d//; $_ } sort @x;
@y = map { s/^\d\d\d//; $_ } sort @y;
print @x, @y;
EOT

This (real) one-liner can also be helpful when converting comments to HTML:

perl -e '$/ = undef; for (split(/\n/, <>)) { s:^ *///? ?::; print "  <p>\n" if !$on && $_ =~ /\S/; print "  </p>\n" if $on && $_ =~ /^\s*$/; print "  $_\n"; $on = ($_ =~ /\S/); } print "  </p>\n" if $on'

  -->

<h1>LLVM's Analysis and Transform Passes</h1>

<ol>
  <li><a href="#intro">Introduction</a></li>
  <li><a href="#analyses">Analysis Passes</a>
  <li><a href="#transforms">Transform Passes</a></li>
  <li><a href="#utilities">Utility Passes</a></li>
</ol>

<div class="doc_author">
  <p>Written by <a href="mailto:rspencer@x10sys.com">Reid Spencer</a>
            and Gordon Henriksen</p>
</div>

<!-- ======================================================================= -->
<h2><a name="intro">Introduction</a></h2>
<div>
  <p>This document serves as a high level summary of the optimization features 
  that LLVM provides. Optimizations are implemented as Passes that traverse some
  portion of a program to either collect information or transform the program.
  The table below divides the passes that LLVM provides into three categories.
  Analysis passes compute information that other passes can use or for debugging
  or program visualization purposes. Transform passes can use (or invalidate)
  the analysis passes. Transform passes all mutate the program in some way. 
  Utility passes provides some utility but don't otherwise fit categorization.
  For example passes to extract functions to bitcode or write a module to
  bitcode are neither analysis nor transform passes.
  <p>The table below provides a quick summary of each pass and links to the more
  complete pass description later in the document.</p>

<table>
<tr><th colspan="2"><b>ANALYSIS PASSES</b></th></tr>
<tr><th>Option</th><th>Name</th></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#aa-eval">-aa-eval</a></td><td>Exhaustive Alias Analysis Precision Evaluator</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#basicaa">-basicaa</a></td><td>Basic Alias Analysis (stateless AA impl)</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#basiccg">-basiccg</a></td><td>Basic CallGraph Construction</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#count-aa">-count-aa</a></td><td>Count Alias Analysis Query Responses</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#debug-aa">-debug-aa</a></td><td>AA use debugger</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#domfrontier">-domfrontier</a></td><td>Dominance Frontier Construction</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#domtree">-domtree</a></td><td>Dominator Tree Construction</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#dot-callgraph">-dot-callgraph</a></td><td>Print Call Graph to 'dot' file</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#dot-cfg">-dot-cfg</a></td><td>Print CFG of function to 'dot' file</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#dot-cfg-only">-dot-cfg-only</a></td><td>Print CFG of function to 'dot' file (with no function bodies)</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#dot-dom">-dot-dom</a></td><td>Print dominance tree of function to 'dot' file</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#dot-dom-only">-dot-dom-only</a></td><td>Print dominance tree of function to 'dot' file (with no function bodies)</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#dot-postdom">-dot-postdom</a></td><td>Print postdominance tree of function to 'dot' file</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#dot-postdom-only">-dot-postdom-only</a></td><td>Print postdominance tree of function to 'dot' file (with no function bodies)</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#globalsmodref-aa">-globalsmodref-aa</a></td><td>Simple mod/ref analysis for globals</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#instcount">-instcount</a></td><td>Counts the various types of Instructions</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#intervals">-intervals</a></td><td>Interval Partition Construction</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#iv-users">-iv-users</a></td><td>Induction Variable Users</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#lazy-value-info">-lazy-value-info</a></td><td>Lazy Value Information Analysis</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#lda">-lda</a></td><td>Loop Dependence Analysis</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#libcall-aa">-libcall-aa</a></td><td>LibCall Alias Analysis</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#lint">-lint</a></td><td>Statically lint-checks LLVM IR</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#loops">-loops</a></td><td>Natural Loop Information</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#memdep">-memdep</a></td><td>Memory Dependence Analysis</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#module-debuginfo">-module-debuginfo</a></td><td>Decodes module-level debug info</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#no-aa">-no-aa</a></td><td>No Alias Analysis (always returns 'may' alias)</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#no-profile">-no-profile</a></td><td>No Profile Information</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#postdomfrontier">-postdomfrontier</a></td><td>Post-Dominance Frontier Construction</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#postdomtree">-postdomtree</a></td><td>Post-Dominator Tree Construction</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#print-alias-sets">-print-alias-sets</a></td><td>Alias Set Printer</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#print-callgraph">-print-callgraph</a></td><td>Print a call graph</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#print-callgraph-sccs">-print-callgraph-sccs</a></td><td>Print SCCs of the Call Graph</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#print-cfg-sccs">-print-cfg-sccs</a></td><td>Print SCCs of each function CFG</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#print-dbginfo">-print-dbginfo</a></td><td>Print debug info in human readable form</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#print-dom-info">-print-dom-info</a></td><td>Dominator Info Printer</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#print-externalfnconstants">-print-externalfnconstants</a></td><td>Print external fn callsites passed constants</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#print-function">-print-function</a></td><td>Print function to stderr</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#print-module">-print-module</a></td><td>Print module to stderr</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#print-used-types">-print-used-types</a></td><td>Find Used Types</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#profile-estimator">-profile-estimator</a></td><td>Estimate profiling information</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#profile-loader">-profile-loader</a></td><td>Load profile information from llvmprof.out</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#profile-verifier">-profile-verifier</a></td><td>Verify profiling information</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#regions">-regions</a></td><td>Detect single entry single exit regions</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#scalar-evolution">-scalar-evolution</a></td><td>Scalar Evolution Analysis</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#scev-aa">-scev-aa</a></td><td>ScalarEvolution-based Alias Analysis</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#targetdata">-targetdata</a></td><td>Target Data Layout</td></tr>


<tr><th colspan="2"><b>TRANSFORM PASSES</b></th></tr>
<tr><th>Option</th><th>Name</th></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#adce">-adce</a></td><td>Aggressive Dead Code Elimination</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#always-inline">-always-inline</a></td><td>Inliner for always_inline functions</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#argpromotion">-argpromotion</a></td><td>Promote 'by reference' arguments to scalars</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#bb-vectorize">-bb-vectorize</a></td><td>Combine instructions to form vector instructions within basic blocks</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#block-placement">-block-placement</a></td><td>Profile Guided Basic Block Placement</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#break-crit-edges">-break-crit-edges</a></td><td>Break critical edges in CFG</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#codegenprepare">-codegenprepare</a></td><td>Optimize for code generation</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#constmerge">-constmerge</a></td><td>Merge Duplicate Global Constants</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#constprop">-constprop</a></td><td>Simple constant propagation</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#dce">-dce</a></td><td>Dead Code Elimination</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#deadargelim">-deadargelim</a></td><td>Dead Argument Elimination</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#deadtypeelim">-deadtypeelim</a></td><td>Dead Type Elimination</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#die">-die</a></td><td>Dead Instruction Elimination</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#dse">-dse</a></td><td>Dead Store Elimination</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#functionattrs">-functionattrs</a></td><td>Deduce function attributes</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#globaldce">-globaldce</a></td><td>Dead Global Elimination</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#globalopt">-globalopt</a></td><td>Global Variable Optimizer</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#gvn">-gvn</a></td><td>Global Value Numbering</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#indvars">-indvars</a></td><td>Canonicalize Induction Variables</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#inline">-inline</a></td><td>Function Integration/Inlining</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#insert-edge-profiling">-insert-edge-profiling</a></td><td>Insert instrumentation for edge profiling</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#insert-optimal-edge-profiling">-insert-optimal-edge-profiling</a></td><td>Insert optimal instrumentation for edge profiling</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#instcombine">-instcombine</a></td><td>Combine redundant instructions</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#internalize">-internalize</a></td><td>Internalize Global Symbols</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#ipconstprop">-ipconstprop</a></td><td>Interprocedural constant propagation</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#ipsccp">-ipsccp</a></td><td>Interprocedural Sparse Conditional Constant Propagation</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#jump-threading">-jump-threading</a></td><td>Jump Threading</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#lcssa">-lcssa</a></td><td>Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#licm">-licm</a></td><td>Loop Invariant Code Motion</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#loop-deletion">-loop-deletion</a></td><td>Delete dead loops</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#loop-extract">-loop-extract</a></td><td>Extract loops into new functions</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#loop-extract-single">-loop-extract-single</a></td><td>Extract at most one loop into a new function</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#loop-reduce">-loop-reduce</a></td><td>Loop Strength Reduction</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#loop-rotate">-loop-rotate</a></td><td>Rotate Loops</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#loop-simplify">-loop-simplify</a></td><td>Canonicalize natural loops</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#loop-unroll">-loop-unroll</a></td><td>Unroll loops</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#loop-unswitch">-loop-unswitch</a></td><td>Unswitch loops</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#loweratomic">-loweratomic</a></td><td>Lower atomic intrinsics to non-atomic form</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#lowerinvoke">-lowerinvoke</a></td><td>Lower invoke and unwind, for unwindless code generators</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#lowerswitch">-lowerswitch</a></td><td>Lower SwitchInst's to branches</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#mem2reg">-mem2reg</a></td><td>Promote Memory to Register</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#memcpyopt">-memcpyopt</a></td><td>MemCpy Optimization</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#mergefunc">-mergefunc</a></td><td>Merge Functions</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#mergereturn">-mergereturn</a></td><td>Unify function exit nodes</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#partial-inliner">-partial-inliner</a></td><td>Partial Inliner</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#prune-eh">-prune-eh</a></td><td>Remove unused exception handling info</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#reassociate">-reassociate</a></td><td>Reassociate expressions</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#reg2mem">-reg2mem</a></td><td>Demote all values to stack slots</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#scalarrepl">-scalarrepl</a></td><td>Scalar Replacement of Aggregates (DT)</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#sccp">-sccp</a></td><td>Sparse Conditional Constant Propagation</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#simplify-libcalls">-simplify-libcalls</a></td><td>Simplify well-known library calls</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#simplifycfg">-simplifycfg</a></td><td>Simplify the CFG</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#sink">-sink</a></td><td>Code sinking</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#sretpromotion">-sretpromotion</a></td><td>Promote sret arguments to multiple ret values</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#strip">-strip</a></td><td>Strip all symbols from a module</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#strip-dead-debug-info">-strip-dead-debug-info</a></td><td>Strip debug info for unused symbols</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#strip-dead-prototypes">-strip-dead-prototypes</a></td><td>Strip Unused Function Prototypes</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#strip-debug-declare">-strip-debug-declare</a></td><td>Strip all llvm.dbg.declare intrinsics</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#strip-nondebug">-strip-nondebug</a></td><td>Strip all symbols, except dbg symbols, from a module</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#tailcallelim">-tailcallelim</a></td><td>Tail Call Elimination</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#tailduplicate">-tailduplicate</a></td><td>Tail Duplication</td></tr>


<tr><th colspan="2"><b>UTILITY PASSES</b></th></tr>
<tr><th>Option</th><th>Name</th></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#deadarghaX0r">-deadarghaX0r</a></td><td>Dead Argument Hacking (BUGPOINT USE ONLY; DO NOT USE)</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#extract-blocks">-extract-blocks</a></td><td>Extract Basic Blocks From Module (for bugpoint use)</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#instnamer">-instnamer</a></td><td>Assign names to anonymous instructions</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#preverify">-preverify</a></td><td>Preliminary module verification</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#verify">-verify</a></td><td>Module Verifier</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#view-cfg">-view-cfg</a></td><td>View CFG of function</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#view-cfg-only">-view-cfg-only</a></td><td>View CFG of function (with no function bodies)</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#view-dom">-view-dom</a></td><td>View dominance tree of function</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#view-dom-only">-view-dom-only</a></td><td>View dominance tree of function (with no function bodies)</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#view-postdom">-view-postdom</a></td><td>View postdominance tree of function</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="#view-postdom-only">-view-postdom-only</a></td><td>View postdominance tree of function (with no function bodies)</td></tr>
</table>

</div>

<!-- ======================================================================= -->
<h2><a name="analyses">Analysis Passes</a></h2>
<div>
  <p>This section describes the LLVM Analysis Passes.</p>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="aa-eval">-aa-eval: Exhaustive Alias Analysis Precision Evaluator</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>This is a simple N^2 alias analysis accuracy evaluator.
  Basically, for each function in the program, it simply queries to see how the
  alias analysis implementation answers alias queries between each pair of
  pointers in the function.</p>

  <p>This is inspired and adapted from code by: Naveen Neelakantam, Francesco
  Spadini, and Wojciech Stryjewski.</p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="basicaa">-basicaa: Basic Alias Analysis (stateless AA impl)</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>A basic alias analysis pass that implements identities (two different
  globals cannot alias, etc), but does no stateful analysis.</p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="basiccg">-basiccg: Basic CallGraph Construction</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>Yet to be written.</p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="count-aa">-count-aa: Count Alias Analysis Query Responses</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  A pass which can be used to count how many alias queries
  are being made and how the alias analysis implementation being used responds.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="debug-aa">-debug-aa: AA use debugger</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  This simple pass checks alias analysis users to ensure that if they
  create a new value, they do not query AA without informing it of the value.
  It acts as a shim over any other AA pass you want.
  </p>
  
  <p>
  Yes keeping track of every value in the program is expensive, but this is 
  a debugging pass.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="domfrontier">-domfrontier: Dominance Frontier Construction</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  This pass is a simple dominator construction algorithm for finding forward
  dominator frontiers.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="domtree">-domtree: Dominator Tree Construction</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  This pass is a simple dominator construction algorithm for finding forward
  dominators.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="dot-callgraph">-dot-callgraph: Print Call Graph to 'dot' file</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  This pass, only available in <code>opt</code>, prints the call graph into a
  <code>.dot</code> graph.  This graph can then be processed with the "dot" tool
  to convert it to postscript or some other suitable format.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="dot-cfg">-dot-cfg: Print CFG of function to 'dot' file</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  This pass, only available in <code>opt</code>, prints the control flow graph
  into a <code>.dot</code> graph.  This graph can then be processed with the
  "dot" tool to convert it to postscript or some other suitable format.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="dot-cfg-only">-dot-cfg-only: Print CFG of function to 'dot' file (with no function bodies)</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  This pass, only available in <code>opt</code>, prints the control flow graph
  into a <code>.dot</code> graph, omitting the function bodies.  This graph can
  then be processed with the "dot" tool to convert it to postscript or some
  other suitable format.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="dot-dom">-dot-dom: Print dominance tree of function to 'dot' file</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  This pass, only available in <code>opt</code>, prints the dominator tree
  into a <code>.dot</code> graph.  This graph can then be processed with the
  "dot" tool to convert it to postscript or some other suitable format.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="dot-dom-only">-dot-dom-only: Print dominance tree of function to 'dot' file (with no function bodies)</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  This pass, only available in <code>opt</code>, prints the dominator tree
  into a <code>.dot</code> graph, omitting the function bodies.  This graph can
  then be processed with the "dot" tool to convert it to postscript or some
  other suitable format.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="dot-postdom">-dot-postdom: Print postdominance tree of function to 'dot' file</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  This pass, only available in <code>opt</code>, prints the post dominator tree
  into a <code>.dot</code> graph.  This graph can then be processed with the
  "dot" tool to convert it to postscript or some other suitable format.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="dot-postdom-only">-dot-postdom-only: Print postdominance tree of function to 'dot' file (with no function bodies)</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  This pass, only available in <code>opt</code>, prints the post dominator tree
  into a <code>.dot</code> graph, omitting the function bodies.  This graph can
  then be processed with the "dot" tool to convert it to postscript or some
  other suitable format.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="globalsmodref-aa">-globalsmodref-aa: Simple mod/ref analysis for globals</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  This simple pass provides alias and mod/ref information for global values
  that do not have their address taken, and keeps track of whether functions
  read or write memory (are "pure").  For this simple (but very common) case,
  we can provide pretty accurate and useful information.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="instcount">-instcount: Counts the various types of Instructions</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  This pass collects the count of all instructions and reports them
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="intervals">-intervals: Interval Partition Construction</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  This analysis calculates and represents the interval partition of a function,
  or a preexisting interval partition.
  </p>
  
  <p>
  In this way, the interval partition may be used to reduce a flow graph down
  to its degenerate single node interval partition (unless it is irreducible).
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="iv-users">-iv-users: Induction Variable Users</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>Bookkeeping for "interesting" users of expressions computed from 
  induction variables.</p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="lazy-value-info">-lazy-value-info: Lazy Value Information Analysis</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>Interface for lazy computation of value constraint information.</p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="lda">-lda: Loop Dependence Analysis</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>Loop dependence analysis framework, which is used to detect dependences in
  memory accesses in loops.</p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="libcall-aa">-libcall-aa: LibCall Alias Analysis</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>LibCall Alias Analysis.</p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="lint">-lint: Statically lint-checks LLVM IR</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>This pass statically checks for common and easily-identified constructs
  which produce undefined or likely unintended behavior in LLVM IR.</p>
 
  <p>It is not a guarantee of correctness, in two ways. First, it isn't
  comprehensive. There are checks which could be done statically which are
  not yet implemented. Some of these are indicated by TODO comments, but
  those aren't comprehensive either. Second, many conditions cannot be
  checked statically. This pass does no dynamic instrumentation, so it
  can't check for all possible problems.</p>
  
  <p>Another limitation is that it assumes all code will be executed. A store
  through a null pointer in a basic block which is never reached is harmless,
  but this pass will warn about it anyway.</p>
 
  <p>Optimization passes may make conditions that this pass checks for more or
  less obvious. If an optimization pass appears to be introducing a warning,
  it may be that the optimization pass is merely exposing an existing
  condition in the code.</p>
  
  <p>This code may be run before instcombine. In many cases, instcombine checks
  for the same kinds of things and turns instructions with undefined behavior
  into unreachable (or equivalent). Because of this, this pass makes some
  effort to look through bitcasts and so on.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="loops">-loops: Natural Loop Information</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  This analysis is used to identify natural loops and determine the loop depth
  of various nodes of the CFG.  Note that the loops identified may actually be
  several natural loops that share the same header node... not just a single
  natural loop.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="memdep">-memdep: Memory Dependence Analysis</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  An analysis that determines, for a given memory operation, what preceding 
  memory operations it depends on.  It builds on alias analysis information, and 
  tries to provide a lazy, caching interface to a common kind of alias 
  information query.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="module-debuginfo">-module-debuginfo: Decodes module-level debug info</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>This pass decodes the debug info metadata in a module and prints in a
 (sufficiently-prepared-) human-readable form.

 For example, run this pass from opt along with the -analyze option, and
 it'll print to standard output.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="no-aa">-no-aa: No Alias Analysis (always returns 'may' alias)</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  This is the default implementation of the Alias Analysis interface. It always
  returns "I don't know" for alias queries.  NoAA is unlike other alias analysis
  implementations, in that it does not chain to a previous analysis. As such it
  doesn't follow many of the rules that other alias analyses must.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="no-profile">-no-profile: No Profile Information</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  The default "no profile" implementation of the abstract
  <code>ProfileInfo</code> interface.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="postdomfrontier">-postdomfrontier: Post-Dominance Frontier Construction</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  This pass is a simple post-dominator construction algorithm for finding
  post-dominator frontiers.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="postdomtree">-postdomtree: Post-Dominator Tree Construction</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  This pass is a simple post-dominator construction algorithm for finding
  post-dominators.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="print-alias-sets">-print-alias-sets: Alias Set Printer</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>Yet to be written.</p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="print-callgraph">-print-callgraph: Print a call graph</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  This pass, only available in <code>opt</code>, prints the call graph to
  standard error in a human-readable form.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="print-callgraph-sccs">-print-callgraph-sccs: Print SCCs of the Call Graph</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  This pass, only available in <code>opt</code>, prints the SCCs of the call
  graph to standard error in a human-readable form.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="print-cfg-sccs">-print-cfg-sccs: Print SCCs of each function CFG</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  This pass, only available in <code>opt</code>, prints the SCCs of each
  function CFG to standard error in a human-readable form.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="print-dbginfo">-print-dbginfo: Print debug info in human readable form</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>Pass that prints instructions, and associated debug info:</p>
  <ul>
  
  <li>source/line/col information</li>
  <li>original variable name</li>
  <li>original type name</li>
  </ul>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="print-dom-info">-print-dom-info: Dominator Info Printer</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>Dominator Info Printer.</p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="print-externalfnconstants">-print-externalfnconstants: Print external fn callsites passed constants</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  This pass, only available in <code>opt</code>, prints out call sites to
  external functions that are called with constant arguments.  This can be
  useful when looking for standard library functions we should constant fold
  or handle in alias analyses.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="print-function">-print-function: Print function to stderr</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  The <code>PrintFunctionPass</code> class is designed to be pipelined with
  other <code>FunctionPass</code>es, and prints out the functions of the module
  as they are processed.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="print-module">-print-module: Print module to stderr</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  This pass simply prints out the entire module when it is executed.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="print-used-types">-print-used-types: Find Used Types</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  This pass is used to seek out all of the types in use by the program.  Note
  that this analysis explicitly does not include types only used by the symbol
  table.
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="profile-estimator">-profile-estimator: Estimate profiling information</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>Profiling information that estimates the profiling information 
  in a very crude and unimaginative way.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="profile-loader">-profile-loader: Load profile information from llvmprof.out</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  A concrete implementation of profiling information that loads the information
  from a profile dump file.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="profile-verifier">-profile-verifier: Verify profiling information</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>Pass that checks profiling information for plausibility.</p>
</div>
<h3>
  <a name="regions">-regions: Detect single entry single exit regions</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  The <code>RegionInfo</code> pass detects single entry single exit regions in a
  function, where a region is defined as any subgraph that is connected to the
  remaining graph at only two spots. Furthermore, an hierarchical region tree is
  built.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="scalar-evolution">-scalar-evolution: Scalar Evolution Analysis</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  The <code>ScalarEvolution</code> analysis can be used to analyze and
  catagorize scalar expressions in loops.  It specializes in recognizing general
  induction variables, representing them with the abstract and opaque
  <code>SCEV</code> class.  Given this analysis, trip counts of loops and other
  important properties can be obtained.
  </p>
  
  <p>
  This analysis is primarily useful for induction variable substitution and
  strength reduction.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="scev-aa">-scev-aa: ScalarEvolution-based Alias Analysis</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>Simple alias analysis implemented in terms of ScalarEvolution queries.
 
  This differs from traditional loop dependence analysis in that it tests
  for dependencies within a single iteration of a loop, rather than
  dependencies between different iterations.
 
  ScalarEvolution has a more complete understanding of pointer arithmetic
  than BasicAliasAnalysis' collection of ad-hoc analyses.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="targetdata">-targetdata: Target Data Layout</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>Provides other passes access to information on how the size and alignment
  required by the the target ABI for various data types.</p>
</div>

</div>

<!-- ======================================================================= -->
<h2><a name="transforms">Transform Passes</a></h2>
<div>
  <p>This section describes the LLVM Transform Passes.</p>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="adce">-adce: Aggressive Dead Code Elimination</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>ADCE aggressively tries to eliminate code. This pass is similar to
  <a href="#dce">DCE</a> but it assumes that values are dead until proven 
  otherwise. This is similar to <a href="#sccp">SCCP</a>, except applied to 
  the liveness of values.</p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="always-inline">-always-inline: Inliner for always_inline functions</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>A custom inliner that handles only functions that are marked as 
  "always inline".</p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="argpromotion">-argpromotion: Promote 'by reference' arguments to scalars</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  This pass promotes "by reference" arguments to be "by value" arguments.  In
  practice, this means looking for internal functions that have pointer
  arguments.  If it can prove, through the use of alias analysis, that an
  argument is *only* loaded, then it can pass the value into the function
  instead of the address of the value.  This can cause recursive simplification
  of code and lead to the elimination of allocas (especially in C++ template
  code like the STL).
  </p>
  
  <p>
  This pass also handles aggregate arguments that are passed into a function,
  scalarizing them if the elements of the aggregate are only loaded.  Note that
  it refuses to scalarize aggregates which would require passing in more than
  three operands to the function, because passing thousands of operands for a
  large array or structure is unprofitable!
  </p>
  
  <p>
  Note that this transformation could also be done for arguments that are only
  stored to (returning the value instead), but does not currently.  This case
  would be best handled when and if LLVM starts supporting multiple return
  values from functions.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="bb-vectorize">-bb-vectorize: Basic-Block Vectorization</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>This pass combines instructions inside basic blocks to form vector
  instructions. It iterates over each basic block, attempting to pair
  compatible instructions, repeating this process until no additional
  pairs are selected for vectorization. When the outputs of some pair
  of compatible instructions are used as inputs by some other pair of
  compatible instructions, those pairs are part of a potential
  vectorization chain. Instruction pairs are only fused into vector
  instructions when they are part of a chain longer than some
  threshold length. Moreover, the pass attempts to find the best
  possible chain for each pair of compatible instructions. These
  heuristics are intended to prevent vectorization in cases where
  it would not yield a performance increase of the resulting code.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="block-placement">-block-placement: Profile Guided Basic Block Placement</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>This pass is a very simple profile guided basic block placement algorithm.
  The idea is to put frequently executed blocks together at the start of the
  function and hopefully increase the number of fall-through conditional
  branches.  If there is no profile information for a particular function, this
  pass basically orders blocks in depth-first order.</p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="break-crit-edges">-break-crit-edges: Break critical edges in CFG</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  Break all of the critical edges in the CFG by inserting a dummy basic block.
  It may be "required" by passes that cannot deal with critical edges. This
  transformation obviously invalidates the CFG, but can update forward dominator
  (set, immediate dominators, tree, and frontier) information.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="codegenprepare">-codegenprepare: Optimize for code generation</a>
</h3>
<div>
  This pass munges the code in the input function to better prepare it for
  SelectionDAG-based code generation. This works around limitations in it's
  basic-block-at-a-time approach. It should eventually be removed.
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="constmerge">-constmerge: Merge Duplicate Global Constants</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  Merges duplicate global constants together into a single constant that is
  shared.  This is useful because some passes (ie TraceValues) insert a lot of
  string constants into the program, regardless of whether or not an existing
  string is available.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="constprop">-constprop: Simple constant propagation</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>This file implements constant propagation and merging. It looks for
  instructions involving only constant operands and replaces them with a
  constant value instead of an instruction. For example:</p>
  <blockquote><pre>add i32 1, 2</pre></blockquote>
  <p>becomes</p>
  <blockquote><pre>i32 3</pre></blockquote>
  <p>NOTE: this pass has a habit of making definitions be dead.  It is a good 
  idea to to run a <a href="#die">DIE</a> (Dead Instruction Elimination) pass 
  sometime after running this pass.</p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="dce">-dce: Dead Code Elimination</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  Dead code elimination is similar to <a href="#die">dead instruction
  elimination</a>, but it rechecks instructions that were used by removed
  instructions to see if they are newly dead.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="deadargelim">-deadargelim: Dead Argument Elimination</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  This pass deletes dead arguments from internal functions.  Dead argument
  elimination removes arguments which are directly dead, as well as arguments
  only passed into function calls as dead arguments of other functions.  This
  pass also deletes dead arguments in a similar way.
  </p>
  
  <p>
  This pass is often useful as a cleanup pass to run after aggressive
  interprocedural passes, which add possibly-dead arguments.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="deadtypeelim">-deadtypeelim: Dead Type Elimination</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  This pass is used to cleanup the output of GCC.  It eliminate names for types
  that are unused in the entire translation unit, using the <a
  href="#findusedtypes">find used types</a> pass.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="die">-die: Dead Instruction Elimination</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  Dead instruction elimination performs a single pass over the function,
  removing instructions that are obviously dead.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="dse">-dse: Dead Store Elimination</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  A trivial dead store elimination that only considers basic-block local
  redundant stores.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="functionattrs">-functionattrs: Deduce function attributes</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>A simple interprocedural pass which walks the call-graph, looking for 
  functions which do not access or only read non-local memory, and marking them 
  readnone/readonly.  In addition, it marks function arguments (of pointer type) 
  'nocapture' if a call to the function does not create any copies of the pointer 
  value that outlive the call. This more or less means that the pointer is only
  dereferenced, and not returned from the function or stored in a global.
  This pass is implemented as a bottom-up traversal of the call-graph.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="globaldce">-globaldce: Dead Global Elimination</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  This transform is designed to eliminate unreachable internal globals from the
  program.  It uses an aggressive algorithm, searching out globals that are
  known to be alive.  After it finds all of the globals which are needed, it
  deletes whatever is left over.  This allows it to delete recursive chunks of
  the program which are unreachable.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="globalopt">-globalopt: Global Variable Optimizer</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  This pass transforms simple global variables that never have their address
  taken.  If obviously true, it marks read/write globals as constant, deletes
  variables only stored to, etc.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="gvn">-gvn: Global Value Numbering</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  This pass performs global value numbering to eliminate fully and partially
  redundant instructions.  It also performs redundant load elimination.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="indvars">-indvars: Canonicalize Induction Variables</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  This transformation analyzes and transforms the induction variables (and
  computations derived from them) into simpler forms suitable for subsequent
  analysis and transformation.
  </p>
  
  <p>
  This transformation makes the following changes to each loop with an
  identifiable induction variable:
  </p>
  
  <ol>
    <li>All loops are transformed to have a <em>single</em> canonical
        induction variable which starts at zero and steps by one.</li>
    <li>The canonical induction variable is guaranteed to be the first PHI node
        in the loop header block.</li>
    <li>Any pointer arithmetic recurrences are raised to use array
        subscripts.</li>
  </ol>
  
  <p>
  If the trip count of a loop is computable, this pass also makes the following
  changes:
  </p>
  
  <ol>
    <li>The exit condition for the loop is canonicalized to compare the
        induction value against the exit value.  This turns loops like:
        <blockquote><pre>for (i = 7; i*i < 1000; ++i)</pre></blockquote>
        into
        <blockquote><pre>for (i = 0; i != 25; ++i)</pre></blockquote></li>
    <li>Any use outside of the loop of an expression derived from the indvar
        is changed to compute the derived value outside of the loop, eliminating
        the dependence on the exit value of the induction variable.  If the only
        purpose of the loop is to compute the exit value of some derived
        expression, this transformation will make the loop dead.</li>
  </ol>
  
  <p>
  This transformation should be followed by strength reduction after all of the
  desired loop transformations have been performed.  Additionally, on targets
  where it is profitable, the loop could be transformed to count down to zero
  (the "do loop" optimization).
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="inline">-inline: Function Integration/Inlining</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  Bottom-up inlining of functions into callees.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="insert-edge-profiling">-insert-edge-profiling: Insert instrumentation for edge profiling</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  This pass instruments the specified program with counters for edge profiling.
  Edge profiling can give a reasonable approximation of the hot paths through a
  program, and is used for a wide variety of program transformations.
  </p>
  
  <p>
  Note that this implementation is very naïve.  It inserts a counter for
  <em>every</em> edge in the program, instead of using control flow information
  to prune the number of counters inserted.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="insert-optimal-edge-profiling">-insert-optimal-edge-profiling: Insert optimal instrumentation for edge profiling</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>This pass instruments the specified program with counters for edge profiling.
  Edge profiling can give a reasonable approximation of the hot paths through a
  program, and is used for a wide variety of program transformations.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="instcombine">-instcombine: Combine redundant instructions</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  Combine instructions to form fewer, simple
  instructions.  This pass does not modify the CFG This pass is where algebraic
  simplification happens.
  </p>
  
  <p>
  This pass combines things like:
  </p>
  
<blockquote><pre
>%Y = add i32 %X, 1
%Z = add i32 %Y, 1</pre></blockquote>
  
  <p>
  into:
  </p>

<blockquote><pre
>%Z = add i32 %X, 2</pre></blockquote>
  
  <p>
  This is a simple worklist driven algorithm.
  </p>
  
  <p>
  This pass guarantees that the following canonicalizations are performed on
  the program:
  </p>

  <ul>
    <li>If a binary operator has a constant operand, it is moved to the right-
        hand side.</li>
    <li>Bitwise operators with constant operands are always grouped so that
        shifts are performed first, then <code>or</code>s, then
        <code>and</code>s, then <code>xor</code>s.</li>
    <li>Compare instructions are converted from <code>&lt;</code>,
        <code>&gt;</code>, <code>≤</code>, or <code>≥</code> to
        <code>=</code> or <code>≠</code> if possible.</li>
    <li>All <code>cmp</code> instructions on boolean values are replaced with
        logical operations.</li>
    <li><code>add <var>X</var>, <var>X</var></code> is represented as
        <code>mul <var>X</var>, 2</code> ⇒ <code>shl <var>X</var>, 1</code></li>
    <li>Multiplies with a constant power-of-two argument are transformed into
        shifts.</li>
    <li>… etc.</li>
  </ul>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="internalize">-internalize: Internalize Global Symbols</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  This pass loops over all of the functions in the input module, looking for a
  main function.  If a main function is found, all other functions and all
  global variables with initializers are marked as internal.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="ipconstprop">-ipconstprop: Interprocedural constant propagation</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  This pass implements an <em>extremely</em> simple interprocedural constant
  propagation pass.  It could certainly be improved in many different ways,
  like using a worklist.  This pass makes arguments dead, but does not remove
  them.  The existing dead argument elimination pass should be run after this
  to clean up the mess.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="ipsccp">-ipsccp: Interprocedural Sparse Conditional Constant Propagation</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  An interprocedural variant of <a href="#sccp">Sparse Conditional Constant 
  Propagation</a>.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="jump-threading">-jump-threading: Jump Threading</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  Jump threading tries to find distinct threads of control flow running through
  a basic block. This pass looks at blocks that have multiple predecessors and
  multiple successors.  If one or more of the predecessors of the block can be
  proven to always cause a jump to one of the successors, we forward the edge
  from the predecessor to the successor by duplicating the contents of this
  block.
  </p>
  <p>
  An example of when this can occur is code like this:
  </p>

  <pre
>if () { ...
  X = 4;
}
if (X &lt; 3) {</pre>

  <p>
  In this case, the unconditional branch at the end of the first if can be
  revectored to the false side of the second if.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="lcssa">-lcssa: Loop-Closed SSA Form Pass</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  This pass transforms loops by placing phi nodes at the end of the loops for
  all values that are live across the loop boundary.  For example, it turns
  the left into the right code:
  </p>
  
  <pre
>for (...)                for (...)
  if (c)                   if (c)
    X1 = ...                 X1 = ...
  else                     else
    X2 = ...                 X2 = ...
  X3 = phi(X1, X2)         X3 = phi(X1, X2)
... = X3 + 4              X4 = phi(X3)
                          ... = X4 + 4</pre>
  
  <p>
  This is still valid LLVM; the extra phi nodes are purely redundant, and will
  be trivially eliminated by <code>InstCombine</code>.  The major benefit of
  this transformation is that it makes many other loop optimizations, such as 
  LoopUnswitching, simpler.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="licm">-licm: Loop Invariant Code Motion</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  This pass performs loop invariant code motion, attempting to remove as much
  code from the body of a loop as possible.  It does this by either hoisting
  code into the preheader block, or by sinking code to the exit blocks if it is
  safe.  This pass also promotes must-aliased memory locations in the loop to
  live in registers, thus hoisting and sinking "invariant" loads and stores.
  </p>
  
  <p>
  This pass uses alias analysis for two purposes:
  </p>
  
  <ul>
    <li>Moving loop invariant loads and calls out of loops.  If we can determine
        that a load or call inside of a loop never aliases anything stored to,
        we can hoist it or sink it like any other instruction.</li>
    <li>Scalar Promotion of Memory - If there is a store instruction inside of
        the loop, we try to move the store to happen AFTER the loop instead of
        inside of the loop.  This can only happen if a few conditions are true:
        <ul>
          <li>The pointer stored through is loop invariant.</li>
          <li>There are no stores or loads in the loop which <em>may</em> alias
              the pointer.  There are no calls in the loop which mod/ref the
              pointer.</li>
        </ul>
        If these conditions are true, we can promote the loads and stores in the
        loop of the pointer to use a temporary alloca'd variable.  We then use
        the mem2reg functionality to construct the appropriate SSA form for the
        variable.</li>
  </ul>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="loop-deletion">-loop-deletion: Delete dead loops</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  This file implements the Dead Loop Deletion Pass.  This pass is responsible
  for eliminating loops with non-infinite computable trip counts that have no
  side effects or volatile instructions, and do not contribute to the
  computation of the function's return value.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="loop-extract">-loop-extract: Extract loops into new functions</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  A pass wrapper around the <code>ExtractLoop()</code> scalar transformation to 
  extract each top-level loop into its own new function. If the loop is the
  <em>only</em> loop in a given function, it is not touched. This is a pass most
  useful for debugging via bugpoint.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="loop-extract-single">-loop-extract-single: Extract at most one loop into a new function</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  Similar to <a href="#loop-extract">Extract loops into new functions</a>,
  this pass extracts one natural loop from the program into a function if it
  can. This is used by bugpoint.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="loop-reduce">-loop-reduce: Loop Strength Reduction</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  This pass performs a strength reduction on array references inside loops that
  have as one or more of their components the loop induction variable.  This is
  accomplished by creating a new value to hold the initial value of the array
  access for the first iteration, and then creating a new GEP instruction in
  the loop to increment the value by the appropriate amount.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="loop-rotate">-loop-rotate: Rotate Loops</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>A simple loop rotation transformation.</p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="loop-simplify">-loop-simplify: Canonicalize natural loops</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  This pass performs several transformations to transform natural loops into a
  simpler form, which makes subsequent analyses and transformations simpler and
  more effective.
  </p>
  
  <p>
  Loop pre-header insertion guarantees that there is a single, non-critical
  entry edge from outside of the loop to the loop header.  This simplifies a
  number of analyses and transformations, such as LICM.
  </p>
  
  <p>
  Loop exit-block insertion guarantees that all exit blocks from the loop
  (blocks which are outside of the loop that have predecessors inside of the
  loop) only have predecessors from inside of the loop (and are thus dominated
  by the loop header).  This simplifies transformations such as store-sinking
  that are built into LICM.
  </p>
  
  <p>
  This pass also guarantees that loops will have exactly one backedge.
  </p>
  
  <p>
  Note that the simplifycfg pass will clean up blocks which are split out but
  end up being unnecessary, so usage of this pass should not pessimize
  generated code.
  </p>
  
  <p>
  This pass obviously modifies the CFG, but updates loop information and
  dominator information.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="loop-unroll">-loop-unroll: Unroll loops</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  This pass implements a simple loop unroller.  It works best when loops have
  been canonicalized by the <a href="#indvars"><tt>-indvars</tt></a> pass,
  allowing it to determine the trip counts of loops easily.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="loop-unswitch">-loop-unswitch: Unswitch loops</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  This pass transforms loops that contain branches on loop-invariant conditions
  to have multiple loops.  For example, it turns the left into the right code:
  </p>
  
  <pre
>for (...)                  if (lic)
  A                          for (...)
  if (lic)                     A; B; C
    B                      else
  C                          for (...)
                               A; C</pre>
  
  <p>
  This can increase the size of the code exponentially (doubling it every time
  a loop is unswitched) so we only unswitch if the resultant code will be
  smaller than a threshold.
  </p>
  
  <p>
  This pass expects LICM to be run before it to hoist invariant conditions out
  of the loop, to make the unswitching opportunity obvious.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="loweratomic">-loweratomic: Lower atomic intrinsics to non-atomic form</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  This pass lowers atomic intrinsics to non-atomic form for use in a known
  non-preemptible environment.
  </p>

  <p>
  The pass does not verify that the environment is non-preemptible (in
  general this would require knowledge of the entire call graph of the
  program including any libraries which may not be available in bitcode form);
  it simply lowers every atomic intrinsic.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="lowerinvoke">-lowerinvoke: Lower invoke and unwind, for unwindless code generators</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  This transformation is designed for use by code generators which do not yet
  support stack unwinding.  This pass supports two models of exception handling
  lowering, the 'cheap' support and the 'expensive' support.
  </p>
  
  <p>
  'Cheap' exception handling support gives the program the ability to execute
  any program which does not "throw an exception", by turning 'invoke'
  instructions into calls and by turning 'unwind' instructions into calls to
  abort().  If the program does dynamically use the unwind instruction, the
  program will print a message then abort.
  </p>
  
  <p>
  'Expensive' exception handling support gives the full exception handling
  support to the program at the cost of making the 'invoke' instruction
  really expensive.  It basically inserts setjmp/longjmp calls to emulate the
  exception handling as necessary.
  </p>
  
  <p>
  Because the 'expensive' support slows down programs a lot, and EH is only
  used for a subset of the programs, it must be specifically enabled by the
  <tt>-enable-correct-eh-support</tt> option.
  </p>
  
  <p>
  Note that after this pass runs the CFG is not entirely accurate (exceptional
  control flow edges are not correct anymore) so only very simple things should
  be done after the lowerinvoke pass has run (like generation of native code).
  This should not be used as a general purpose "my LLVM-to-LLVM pass doesn't
  support the invoke instruction yet" lowering pass.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="lowerswitch">-lowerswitch: Lower SwitchInst's to branches</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  Rewrites <tt>switch</tt> instructions with a sequence of branches, which
  allows targets to get away with not implementing the switch instruction until
  it is convenient.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="mem2reg">-mem2reg: Promote Memory to Register</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  This file promotes memory references to be register references.  It promotes
  <tt>alloca</tt> instructions which only have <tt>load</tt>s and
  <tt>store</tt>s as uses.  An <tt>alloca</tt> is transformed by using dominator
  frontiers to place <tt>phi</tt> nodes, then traversing the function in
  depth-first order to rewrite <tt>load</tt>s and <tt>store</tt>s as
  appropriate. This is just the standard SSA construction algorithm to construct
  "pruned" SSA form.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="memcpyopt">-memcpyopt: MemCpy Optimization</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  This pass performs various transformations related to eliminating memcpy
  calls, or transforming sets of stores into memset's.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="mergefunc">-mergefunc: Merge Functions</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>This pass looks for equivalent functions that are mergable and folds them.
 
  A hash is computed from the function, based on its type and number of
  basic blocks.
 
  Once all hashes are computed, we perform an expensive equality comparison
  on each function pair. This takes n^2/2 comparisons per bucket, so it's
  important that the hash function be high quality. The equality comparison
  iterates through each instruction in each basic block.
 
  When a match is found the functions are folded. If both functions are
  overridable, we move the functionality into a new internal function and
  leave two overridable thunks to it.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="mergereturn">-mergereturn: Unify function exit nodes</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  Ensure that functions have at most one <tt>ret</tt> instruction in them.
  Additionally, it keeps track of which node is the new exit node of the CFG.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="partial-inliner">-partial-inliner: Partial Inliner</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>This pass performs partial inlining, typically by inlining an if 
  statement that surrounds the body of the function.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="prune-eh">-prune-eh: Remove unused exception handling info</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  This file implements a simple interprocedural pass which walks the call-graph,
  turning <tt>invoke</tt> instructions into <tt>call</tt> instructions if and
  only if the callee cannot throw an exception. It implements this as a
  bottom-up traversal of the call-graph.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="reassociate">-reassociate: Reassociate expressions</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  This pass reassociates commutative expressions in an order that is designed
  to promote better constant propagation, GCSE, LICM, PRE, etc.
  </p>
  
  <p>
  For example: 4 + (<var>x</var> + 5) ⇒ <var>x</var> + (4 + 5)
  </p>
  
  <p>
  In the implementation of this algorithm, constants are assigned rank = 0,
  function arguments are rank = 1, and other values are assigned ranks
  corresponding to the reverse post order traversal of current function
  (starting at 2), which effectively gives values in deep loops higher rank
  than values not in loops.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="reg2mem">-reg2mem: Demote all values to stack slots</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  This file demotes all registers to memory references.  It is intented to be
  the inverse of <a href="#mem2reg"><tt>-mem2reg</tt></a>.  By converting to
  <tt>load</tt> instructions, the only values live across basic blocks are
  <tt>alloca</tt> instructions and <tt>load</tt> instructions before
  <tt>phi</tt> nodes. It is intended that this should make CFG hacking much 
  easier. To make later hacking easier, the entry block is split into two, such
  that all introduced <tt>alloca</tt> instructions (and nothing else) are in the
  entry block.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="scalarrepl">-scalarrepl: Scalar Replacement of Aggregates (DT)</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  The well-known scalar replacement of aggregates transformation.  This
  transform breaks up <tt>alloca</tt> instructions of aggregate type (structure
  or array) into individual <tt>alloca</tt> instructions for each member if
  possible.  Then, if possible, it transforms the individual <tt>alloca</tt>
  instructions into nice clean scalar SSA form.
  </p>
  
  <p>
  This combines a simple scalar replacement of aggregates algorithm with the <a
  href="#mem2reg"><tt>mem2reg</tt></a> algorithm because often interact, 
  especially for C++ programs.  As such, iterating between <tt>scalarrepl</tt>, 
  then <a href="#mem2reg"><tt>mem2reg</tt></a> until we run out of things to 
  promote works well.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="sccp">-sccp: Sparse Conditional Constant Propagation</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  Sparse conditional constant propagation and merging, which can be summarized
  as:
  </p>
  
  <ol>
    <li>Assumes values are constant unless proven otherwise</li>
    <li>Assumes BasicBlocks are dead unless proven otherwise</li>
    <li>Proves values to be constant, and replaces them with constants</li>
    <li>Proves conditional branches to be unconditional</li>
  </ol>
  
  <p>
  Note that this pass has a habit of making definitions be dead.  It is a good
  idea to to run a DCE pass sometime after running this pass.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="simplify-libcalls">-simplify-libcalls: Simplify well-known library calls</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  Applies a variety of small optimizations for calls to specific well-known 
  function calls (e.g. runtime library functions). For example, a call
   <tt>exit(3)</tt> that occurs within the <tt>main()</tt> function can be 
   transformed into simply <tt>return 3</tt>.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="simplifycfg">-simplifycfg: Simplify the CFG</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  Performs dead code elimination and basic block merging. Specifically:
  </p>
  
  <ol>
    <li>Removes basic blocks with no predecessors.</li>
    <li>Merges a basic block into its predecessor if there is only one and the
        predecessor only has one successor.</li>
    <li>Eliminates PHI nodes for basic blocks with a single predecessor.</li>
    <li>Eliminates a basic block that only contains an unconditional
        branch.</li>
  </ol>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="sink">-sink: Code sinking</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>This pass moves instructions into successor blocks, when possible, so that
 they aren't executed on paths where their results aren't needed.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="sretpromotion">-sretpromotion: Promote sret arguments to multiple ret values</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  This pass finds functions that return a struct (using a pointer to the struct
  as the first argument of the function, marked with the '<tt>sret</tt>' attribute) and
  replaces them with a new function that simply returns each of the elements of
  that struct (using multiple return values).
  </p>

  <p>
  This pass works under a number of conditions:
  </p>

  <ul>
  <li>The returned struct must not contain other structs</li>
  <li>The returned struct must only be used to load values from</li>
  <li>The placeholder struct passed in is the result of an <tt>alloca</tt></li>
  </ul>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="strip">-strip: Strip all symbols from a module</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  performs code stripping. this transformation can delete:
  </p>
  
  <ol>
    <li>names for virtual registers</li>
    <li>symbols for internal globals and functions</li>
    <li>debug information</li>
  </ol>
  
  <p>
  note that this transformation makes code much less readable, so it should
  only be used in situations where the <tt>strip</tt> utility would be used,
  such as reducing code size or making it harder to reverse engineer code.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="strip-dead-debug-info">-strip-dead-debug-info: Strip debug info for unused symbols</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  performs code stripping. this transformation can delete:
  </p>
  
  <ol>
    <li>names for virtual registers</li>
    <li>symbols for internal globals and functions</li>
    <li>debug information</li>
  </ol>
  
  <p>
  note that this transformation makes code much less readable, so it should
  only be used in situations where the <tt>strip</tt> utility would be used,
  such as reducing code size or making it harder to reverse engineer code.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="strip-dead-prototypes">-strip-dead-prototypes: Strip Unused Function Prototypes</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  This pass loops over all of the functions in the input module, looking for
  dead declarations and removes them. Dead declarations are declarations of
  functions for which no implementation is available (i.e., declarations for
  unused library functions).
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="strip-debug-declare">-strip-debug-declare: Strip all llvm.dbg.declare intrinsics</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>This pass implements code stripping. Specifically, it can delete:</p>
  <ul>
  <li>names for virtual registers</li>
  <li>symbols for internal globals and functions</li>
  <li>debug information</li>
  </ul>
  <p>
  Note that this transformation makes code much less readable, so it should
  only be used in situations where the 'strip' utility would be used, such as
  reducing code size or making it harder to reverse engineer code.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="strip-nondebug">-strip-nondebug: Strip all symbols, except dbg symbols, from a module</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>This pass implements code stripping. Specifically, it can delete:</p>
  <ul>
  <li>names for virtual registers</li>
  <li>symbols for internal globals and functions</li>
  <li>debug information</li>
  </ul>
  <p>
  Note that this transformation makes code much less readable, so it should
  only be used in situations where the 'strip' utility would be used, such as
  reducing code size or making it harder to reverse engineer code.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="tailcallelim">-tailcallelim: Tail Call Elimination</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  This file transforms calls of the current function (self recursion) followed
  by a return instruction with a branch to the entry of the function, creating
  a loop.  This pass also implements the following extensions to the basic
  algorithm:
  </p>
  
  <ul>
  <li>Trivial instructions between the call and return do not prevent the
      transformation from taking place, though currently the analysis cannot
      support moving any really useful instructions (only dead ones).
  <li>This pass transforms functions that are prevented from being tail
      recursive by an associative expression to use an accumulator variable,
      thus compiling the typical naive factorial or <tt>fib</tt> implementation
      into efficient code.
  <li>TRE is performed if the function returns void, if the return
      returns the result returned by the call, or if the function returns a
      run-time constant on all exits from the function.  It is possible, though
      unlikely, that the return returns something else (like constant 0), and
      can still be TRE'd.  It can be TRE'd if <em>all other</em> return 
      instructions in the function return the exact same value.
  <li>If it can prove that callees do not access theier caller stack frame,
      they are marked as eligible for tail call elimination (by the code
      generator).
  </ul>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="tailduplicate">-tailduplicate: Tail Duplication</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  This pass performs a limited form of tail duplication, intended to simplify
  CFGs by removing some unconditional branches.  This pass is necessary to
  straighten out loops created by the C front-end, but also is capable of
  making other code nicer.  After this pass is run, the CFG simplify pass
  should be run to clean up the mess.
  </p>
</div>

</div>

<!-- ======================================================================= -->
<h2><a name="utilities">Utility Passes</a></h2>
<div>
  <p>This section describes the LLVM Utility Passes.</p>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="deadarghaX0r">-deadarghaX0r: Dead Argument Hacking (BUGPOINT USE ONLY; DO NOT USE)</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  Same as dead argument elimination, but deletes arguments to functions which
  are external.  This is only for use by <a
  href="Bugpoint.html">bugpoint</a>.</p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="extract-blocks">-extract-blocks: Extract Basic Blocks From Module (for bugpoint use)</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  This pass is used by bugpoint to extract all blocks from the module into their
  own functions.</p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="instnamer">-instnamer: Assign names to anonymous instructions</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>This is a little utility pass that gives instructions names, this is mostly
 useful when diffing the effect of an optimization because deleting an
 unnamed instruction can change all other instruction numbering, making the
 diff very noisy.  
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="preverify">-preverify: Preliminary module verification</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  Ensures that the module is in the form required by the <a
  href="#verifier">Module Verifier</a> pass.
  </p>
  
  <p>
  Running the verifier runs this pass automatically, so there should be no need
  to use it directly.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="verify">-verify: Module Verifier</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  Verifies an LLVM IR code. This is useful to run after an optimization which is
  undergoing testing. Note that <tt>llvm-as</tt> verifies its input before
  emitting bitcode, and also that malformed bitcode is likely to make LLVM
  crash. All language front-ends are therefore encouraged to verify their output
  before performing optimizing transformations.
  </p>

  <ul>
    <li>Both of a binary operator's parameters are of the same type.</li>
    <li>Verify that the indices of mem access instructions match other
        operands.</li>
    <li>Verify that arithmetic and other things are only performed on
        first-class types.  Verify that shifts and logicals only happen on
        integrals f.e.</li>
    <li>All of the constants in a switch statement are of the correct type.</li>
    <li>The code is in valid SSA form.</li>
    <li>It is illegal to put a label into any other type (like a structure) or 
        to return one.</li>
    <li>Only phi nodes can be self referential: <tt>%x = add i32 %x, %x</tt> is
        invalid.</li>
    <li>PHI nodes must have an entry for each predecessor, with no extras.</li>
    <li>PHI nodes must be the first thing in a basic block, all grouped
        together.</li>
    <li>PHI nodes must have at least one entry.</li>
    <li>All basic blocks should only end with terminator insts, not contain
        them.</li>
    <li>The entry node to a function must not have predecessors.</li>
    <li>All Instructions must be embedded into a basic block.</li>
    <li>Functions cannot take a void-typed parameter.</li>
    <li>Verify that a function's argument list agrees with its declared
        type.</li>
    <li>It is illegal to specify a name for a void value.</li>
    <li>It is illegal to have a internal global value with no initializer.</li>
    <li>It is illegal to have a ret instruction that returns a value that does
        not agree with the function return value type.</li>
    <li>Function call argument types match the function prototype.</li>
    <li>All other things that are tested by asserts spread about the code.</li>
  </ul>
  
  <p>
  Note that this does not provide full security verification (like Java), but
  instead just tries to ensure that code is well-formed.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="view-cfg">-view-cfg: View CFG of function</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  Displays the control flow graph using the GraphViz tool.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="view-cfg-only">-view-cfg-only: View CFG of function (with no function bodies)</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  Displays the control flow graph using the GraphViz tool, but omitting function
  bodies.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="view-dom">-view-dom: View dominance tree of function</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  Displays the dominator tree using the GraphViz tool.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="view-dom-only">-view-dom-only: View dominance tree of function (with no function bodies)</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  Displays the dominator tree using the GraphViz tool, but omitting function
  bodies.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="view-postdom">-view-postdom: View postdominance tree of function</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  Displays the post dominator tree using the GraphViz tool.
  </p>
</div>

<!-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -->
<h3>
  <a name="view-postdom-only">-view-postdom-only: View postdominance tree of function (with no function bodies)</a>
</h3>
<div>
  <p>
  Displays the post dominator tree using the GraphViz tool, but omitting
  function bodies.
  </p>
</div>

</div>

<!-- *********************************************************************** -->

<hr>
<address>
  <a href="http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/check/referer"><img
  src="http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/images/vcss-blue" alt="Valid CSS"></a>
  <a href="http://validator.w3.org/check/referer"><img
  src="http://www.w3.org/Icons/valid-html401-blue" alt="Valid HTML 4.01"></a>

  <a href="mailto:rspencer@x10sys.com">Reid Spencer</a><br>
  <a href="http://llvm.org/">LLVM Compiler Infrastructure</a><br>
  Last modified: $Date: 2012-01-31 19:51:43 -0800 (Tue, 31 Jan 2012) $
</address>

</body>
</html>
back to top