Revision 0baca070068c58b95e342881d9da4840d5cf3bd1 authored by Linus Torvalds on 22 September 2020, 21:36:50 UTC, committed by Linus Torvalds on 22 September 2020, 21:36:50 UTC
Pull io_uring fixes from Jens Axboe:
 "A few fixes - most of them regression fixes from this cycle, but also
  a few stable heading fixes, and a build fix for the included demo tool
  since some systems now actually have gettid() available"

* tag 'io_uring-5.9-2020-09-22' of git://git.kernel.dk/linux-block:
  io_uring: fix openat/openat2 unified prep handling
  io_uring: mark statx/files_update/epoll_ctl as non-SQPOLL
  tools/io_uring: fix compile breakage
  io_uring: don't use retry based buffered reads for non-async bdev
  io_uring: don't re-setup vecs/iter in io_resumit_prep() is already there
  io_uring: don't run task work on an exiting task
  io_uring: drop 'ctx' ref on task work cancelation
  io_uring: grab any needed state during defer prep
2 parent s c37b718 + 4eb8dde
Raw File
TODO
Do the ax25_list_lock, ax25_dev_lock, linkfail_lockreally, ax25_frag_lock and
listen_lock have to be bh-safe?

Do the netrom and rose locks have to be bh-safe?

A device might be deleted after lookup in the SIOCADDRT ioctl but before it's
being used.

Routes to a device being taken down might be deleted by ax25_rt_device_down
but added by somebody else before the device has been deleted fully.

The ax25_rt_find_route synopsys is pervert but I somehow had to deal with
the race caused by the static variable in it's previous implementation.

Implement proper socket locking in netrom and rose.

Check socket locking when ax25_rcv is sending to raw sockets.  In particular
ax25_send_to_raw() seems fishy.  Heck - ax25_rcv is fishy.

Handle XID and TEST frames properly.
back to top