Revision 10d2f35436fb350c42bdb8396aee424a9bce44b5 authored by Johannes Schindelin on 31 August 2018, 23:45:04 UTC, committed by Junio C Hamano on 04 September 2018, 15:59:33 UTC
When an interactive rebase was stopped at the end of a fixup/squash
chain, the user might have edited the commit manually before continuing
(with either `git rebase --skip` or `git rebase --continue`, it does not
really matter which).

We need to be very careful to wrap up the fixup/squash chain also in
this scenario: otherwise the next fixup/squash chain would try to pick
up where the previous one was left.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
1 parent 2f3eb68
Raw File
tag.h
#ifndef TAG_H
#define TAG_H

#include "object.h"

extern const char *tag_type;

struct tag {
	struct object object;
	struct object *tagged;
	char *tag;
	timestamp_t date;
};

extern struct tag *lookup_tag(const struct object_id *oid);
extern int parse_tag_buffer(struct tag *item, const void *data, unsigned long size);
extern int parse_tag(struct tag *item);
extern struct object *deref_tag(struct object *, const char *, int);
extern struct object *deref_tag_noverify(struct object *);
extern int gpg_verify_tag(const struct object_id *oid,
		const char *name_to_report, unsigned flags);

#endif /* TAG_H */
back to top