Revision 10d2f35436fb350c42bdb8396aee424a9bce44b5 authored by Johannes Schindelin on 31 August 2018, 23:45:04 UTC, committed by Junio C Hamano on 04 September 2018, 15:59:33 UTC
When an interactive rebase was stopped at the end of a fixup/squash chain, the user might have edited the commit manually before continuing (with either `git rebase --skip` or `git rebase --continue`, it does not really matter which). We need to be very careful to wrap up the fixup/squash chain also in this scenario: otherwise the next fixup/squash chain would try to pick up where the previous one was left. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
1 parent 2f3eb68
tag.h
#ifndef TAG_H
#define TAG_H
#include "object.h"
extern const char *tag_type;
struct tag {
struct object object;
struct object *tagged;
char *tag;
timestamp_t date;
};
extern struct tag *lookup_tag(const struct object_id *oid);
extern int parse_tag_buffer(struct tag *item, const void *data, unsigned long size);
extern int parse_tag(struct tag *item);
extern struct object *deref_tag(struct object *, const char *, int);
extern struct object *deref_tag_noverify(struct object *);
extern int gpg_verify_tag(const struct object_id *oid,
const char *name_to_report, unsigned flags);
#endif /* TAG_H */
![swh spinner](/static/img/swh-spinner.gif)
Computing file changes ...