Revision 10f02d1c59e55f529140dda3a92f0099d748451c authored by Samuel Thibault on 21 May 2005, 15:50:15 UTC, committed by Linus Torvalds on 21 May 2005, 17:46:48 UTC
In _spin_unlock_bh(lock):
	do { \
		_raw_spin_unlock(lock); \
		preempt_enable(); \
		local_bh_enable(); \
		__release(lock); \
	} while (0)

there is no reason for using preempt_enable() instead of a simple
preempt_enable_no_resched()

Since we know bottom halves are disabled, preempt_schedule() will always
return at once (preempt_count!=0), and hence preempt_check_resched() is
useless here...

This fixes it by using "preempt_enable_no_resched()" instead of the
"preempt_enable()", and thus avoids the useless preempt_check_resched()
just before re-enabling bottom halves.

Signed-off-by: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
1 parent 9636273
History
File Mode Size
Makefile -rw-r--r-- 237 bytes
compat.c -rw-r--r-- 17.3 KB
compat_mq.c -rw-r--r-- 4.0 KB
mqueue.c -rw-r--r-- 29.1 KB
msg.c -rw-r--r-- 18.9 KB
msgutil.c -rw-r--r-- 2.4 KB
sem.c -rw-r--r-- 33.7 KB
shm.c -rw-r--r-- 21.3 KB
util.c -rw-r--r-- 13.2 KB
util.h -rw-r--r-- 2.3 KB

back to top