Revision 1a3f2fd7fc4e8f24510830e265de2ffb8e3300d2 authored by Lu Baolu on 27 September 2020, 06:24:28 UTC, committed by Joerg Roedel on 01 October 2020, 12:54:17 UTC
Lock(&iommu->lock) without disabling irq causes lockdep warnings.
[ 12.703950] ========================================================
[ 12.703962] WARNING: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected
[ 12.703975] 5.9.0-rc6+ #659 Not tainted
[ 12.703983] --------------------------------------------------------
[ 12.703995] systemd-udevd/284 just changed the state of lock:
[ 12.704007] ffffffffbd6ff4d8 (device_domain_lock){..-.}-{2:2}, at:
iommu_flush_dev_iotlb.part.57+0x2e/0x90
[ 12.704031] but this lock took another, SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock in the past:
[ 12.704043] (&iommu->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}
[ 12.704045]
and interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between
them.
[ 12.704073]
other info that might help us debug this:
[ 12.704085] Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:
[ 12.704097] CPU0 CPU1
[ 12.704106] ---- ----
[ 12.704115] lock(&iommu->lock);
[ 12.704123] local_irq_disable();
[ 12.704134] lock(device_domain_lock);
[ 12.704146] lock(&iommu->lock);
[ 12.704158] <Interrupt>
[ 12.704164] lock(device_domain_lock);
[ 12.704174]
*** DEADLOCK ***
Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200927062428.13713-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
1 parent 0bbe4ce
kmemleak-test.c
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
/*
* mm/kmemleak-test.c
*
* Copyright (C) 2008 ARM Limited
* Written by Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
*/
#define pr_fmt(fmt) "kmemleak: " fmt
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/vmalloc.h>
#include <linux/list.h>
#include <linux/percpu.h>
#include <linux/fdtable.h>
#include <linux/kmemleak.h>
struct test_node {
long header[25];
struct list_head list;
long footer[25];
};
static LIST_HEAD(test_list);
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(void *, kmemleak_test_pointer);
/*
* Some very simple testing. This function needs to be extended for
* proper testing.
*/
static int __init kmemleak_test_init(void)
{
struct test_node *elem;
int i;
pr_info("Kmemleak testing\n");
/* make some orphan objects */
pr_info("kmalloc(32) = %p\n", kmalloc(32, GFP_KERNEL));
pr_info("kmalloc(32) = %p\n", kmalloc(32, GFP_KERNEL));
pr_info("kmalloc(1024) = %p\n", kmalloc(1024, GFP_KERNEL));
pr_info("kmalloc(1024) = %p\n", kmalloc(1024, GFP_KERNEL));
pr_info("kmalloc(2048) = %p\n", kmalloc(2048, GFP_KERNEL));
pr_info("kmalloc(2048) = %p\n", kmalloc(2048, GFP_KERNEL));
pr_info("kmalloc(4096) = %p\n", kmalloc(4096, GFP_KERNEL));
pr_info("kmalloc(4096) = %p\n", kmalloc(4096, GFP_KERNEL));
#ifndef CONFIG_MODULES
pr_info("kmem_cache_alloc(files_cachep) = %p\n",
kmem_cache_alloc(files_cachep, GFP_KERNEL));
pr_info("kmem_cache_alloc(files_cachep) = %p\n",
kmem_cache_alloc(files_cachep, GFP_KERNEL));
#endif
pr_info("vmalloc(64) = %p\n", vmalloc(64));
pr_info("vmalloc(64) = %p\n", vmalloc(64));
pr_info("vmalloc(64) = %p\n", vmalloc(64));
pr_info("vmalloc(64) = %p\n", vmalloc(64));
pr_info("vmalloc(64) = %p\n", vmalloc(64));
/*
* Add elements to a list. They should only appear as orphan
* after the module is removed.
*/
for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
elem = kzalloc(sizeof(*elem), GFP_KERNEL);
pr_info("kzalloc(sizeof(*elem)) = %p\n", elem);
if (!elem)
return -ENOMEM;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&elem->list);
list_add_tail(&elem->list, &test_list);
}
for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
per_cpu(kmemleak_test_pointer, i) = kmalloc(129, GFP_KERNEL);
pr_info("kmalloc(129) = %p\n",
per_cpu(kmemleak_test_pointer, i));
}
return 0;
}
module_init(kmemleak_test_init);
static void __exit kmemleak_test_exit(void)
{
struct test_node *elem, *tmp;
/*
* Remove the list elements without actually freeing the
* memory.
*/
list_for_each_entry_safe(elem, tmp, &test_list, list)
list_del(&elem->list);
}
module_exit(kmemleak_test_exit);
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
Computing file changes ...
