Revision 223a10a98135da38d3668973d72cdffb1ced4b7d authored by Oleg Nesterov on 18 May 2007, 07:36:42 UTC, committed by Linus Torvalds on 18 May 2007, 15:17:17 UTC
As pointed out by Jarek Poplawski, the patch [WORKQUEUE]: cancel_delayed_work: use del_timer() instead of del_timer_sync() commit: 071b638689464c6b39407025eedd810d5b5e6f5d was wrong, it was merged by mistake after that. From the changelog: after this patch: ... delayed_work_timer_fn->__queue_work() in progress. The latter doesn't differ from the caller's POV, it does make a difference if the caller calls flush_workqueue() after cancel_delayed_work(), in that case flush_workqueue() can miss this work_struct. Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru> Cc: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
1 parent b465223
File | Mode | Size |
---|---|---|
Makefile | -rw-r--r-- | 254 bytes |
af_rose.c | -rw-r--r-- | 37.7 KB |
rose_dev.c | -rw-r--r-- | 3.5 KB |
rose_in.c | -rw-r--r-- | 7.5 KB |
rose_link.c | -rw-r--r-- | 6.8 KB |
rose_loopback.c | -rw-r--r-- | 2.4 KB |
rose_out.c | -rw-r--r-- | 2.8 KB |
rose_route.c | -rw-r--r-- | 30.3 KB |
rose_subr.c | -rw-r--r-- | 11.5 KB |
rose_timer.c | -rw-r--r-- | 4.9 KB |
sysctl_net_rose.c | -rw-r--r-- | 4.3 KB |
![swh spinner](/static/img/swh-spinner.gif)
Computing file changes ...