* Make AST and IR share type legalization code

A previous change already made it so that the AST-to-AST lowering/legalization pass could work together with IR-based lowering of `import`ed code, but that change didn't take into account the case where a function written in the AST needed to call an IR function and pass in a type that required legalization.

Both the IR-based and AST-based passes had their own approaches to type legalization, that mostly agreed on the desired output, but they ended up creating their own representations for legalized types which would mean that for a function call the caller and callee might end up legalizing the parameter list to use different types.

This change tries to fix this issue (and adds a new test case that relies on the fix) by massively overhauling the AST-based legalization pass so that it uses the same type legalization code as the IR. The shared code has been moved out into `legalize-types.{h,cpp}`.

Notes:

- I eliminated the `FilteredTupleType` type, since it was starting to cause code duplication in a lot of places. Instead, type legalization just creates new `struct` types to represent the result of filtering.

  - One big consequence of this is that the `LegalType::pair` case needs to remember for each field in the original type which field (if any) in the new `struct` type it maps to

  - A big source of complexity (and probably bugs) in this code is trying to figure out how to parent these new `struct` definitions effectively. A good follow-on change would be something that outputs declarations on-demand during the AST emit logic (as we do for the IR), just to avoid some of this song and dance.

- The old AST type legalization had a notion of both a "tuple" type and a "varying tuple" type. The "tuple" case was quite complex, and combined behavior currently handled by `LegalType::pair` (for splitting into ordinary and special sides) and `LegalType::tuple` (for holding multiple distinct elements to represent the fields of an aggregate). The "varying tuple" case was closer to `LegalType::tuple`, so I tried to just re-use the existing logic for that too. The one place this potentially gets messy is in `reifyTuple()`.

  - The messiest bit of handling the "varying tuple" concept (which is used for GLSL shader inputs/outputs since they have to be scalarized) is that when passing them as function arguments we need to reify the tuple back into a structured value. Because the `LegalExpr` hierarchy doesn't have type information, but constructing a value of the "original" type requires such information, things get a little messy.

- I did *not* try to deal with any of the logic related to handling system inputs/outputs for cross-compilation purposes. Of course, the long-term goal is that any actual cross-compilation is handled via the IR, but this change can't afford to break the AST-based path just yet. As a result, there is still quite a bit of complexity in the handling of assignment, to deal with cases where "fixups" are required.

* fixup: bad code in macro, not caught by Visual Studio compiler

* fixup: more stuff missed by VS compiler

* fixup: VS continutes to miss stuff in UNREACHABLE_RETURN