Revision 340b3a5b35c0919e1535b355a9eafe1f81c4cae3 authored by Linus Torvalds on 28 February 2016, 00:58:32 UTC, committed by Linus Torvalds on 28 February 2016, 00:58:32 UTC
Pull ARM SoC fixes from Olof Johansson:
"We didn't have a batch last week, so this one is slightly larger.
None of them are scary though, a handful of fixes for small DT pieces,
replacing properties with newer conventions.
Highlights:
- N900 fix for setting system revision
- onenand init fix to avoid filesystem corruption
- Clock fix for audio on Beaglebone-x15
- Fixes on shmobile to deal with CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA (default y in 4.6)
+ misc smaller stuff"
* tag 'armsoc-fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm/arm-soc:
MAINTAINERS: Extend info, add wiki and ml for meson arch
MAINTAINERS: alpine: add a new maintainer and update the entry
ARM: at91/dt: fix typo in sama5d2 pinmux descriptions
ARM: OMAP2+: Fix onenand initialization to avoid filesystem corruption
Revert "regulator: tps65217: remove tps65217.dtsi file"
ARM: shmobile: Remove shmobile_boot_arg
ARM: shmobile: Move shmobile_smp_{mpidr, fn, arg}[] from .text to .bss
ARM: shmobile: r8a7779: Remove remainings of removed SCU boot setup code
ARM: shmobile: Move shmobile_scu_base from .text to .bss
ARM: OMAP2+: Fix omap_device for module reload on PM runtime forbid
ARM: OMAP2+: Improve omap_device error for driver writers
ARM: DTS: am57xx-beagle-x15: Select SYS_CLK2 for audio clocks
ARM: dts: am335x/am57xx: replace gpio-key,wakeup with wakeup-source property
ARM: OMAP2+: Set system_rev from ATAGS for n900
ARM: dts: orion5x: fix the missing mtd flash on linkstation lswtgl
ARM: dts: kirkwood: use unique machine name for ds112
ARM: dts: imx6: remove bogus interrupt-parent from CAAM node
CodeOfConflict
Code of Conflict
----------------
The Linux kernel development effort is a very personal process compared
to "traditional" ways of developing software. Your code and ideas
behind it will be carefully reviewed, often resulting in critique and
criticism. The review will almost always require improvements to the
code before it can be included in the kernel. Know that this happens
because everyone involved wants to see the best possible solution for
the overall success of Linux. This development process has been proven
to create the most robust operating system kernel ever, and we do not
want to do anything to cause the quality of submission and eventual
result to ever decrease.
If however, anyone feels personally abused, threatened, or otherwise
uncomfortable due to this process, that is not acceptable. If so,
please contact the Linux Foundation's Technical Advisory Board at
<tab@lists.linux-foundation.org>, or the individual members, and they
will work to resolve the issue to the best of their ability. For more
information on who is on the Technical Advisory Board and what their
role is, please see:
http://www.linuxfoundation.org/programs/advisory-councils/tab
As a reviewer of code, please strive to keep things civil and focused on
the technical issues involved. We are all humans, and frustrations can
be high on both sides of the process. Try to keep in mind the immortal
words of Bill and Ted, "Be excellent to each other."
Computing file changes ...
