Revision 39d709392ffc1d05f825191b07b7d865d434f282 authored by Randy Dunlap on 11 September 2010, 22:55:26 UTC, committed by Linus Torvalds on 11 September 2010, 23:49:21 UTC
Fix docbook templates that reference files that do not contain the expected kernel-doc notation. Fixes these warnings: Warning(arch/x86/include/asm/unaligned.h): no structured comments found Warning(lib/vsprintf.c): no structured comments found These cause errors in the generated html output, like below, so drop these lines. Name arch/x86/include/asm/unaligned.h - Document generation inconsistency Oops Warning The template for this document tried to insert the structured comment from the file arch/x86/include/asm/unaligned.h at this point, but none was found. This dummy section is inserted to allow generation to continue. Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
1 parent eda603f
stacktrace.c
/*
* kernel/stacktrace.c
*
* Stack trace management functions
*
* Copyright (C) 2006 Red Hat, Inc., Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
*/
#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/kallsyms.h>
#include <linux/stacktrace.h>
void print_stack_trace(struct stack_trace *trace, int spaces)
{
int i;
if (WARN_ON(!trace->entries))
return;
for (i = 0; i < trace->nr_entries; i++) {
printk("%*c", 1 + spaces, ' ');
print_ip_sym(trace->entries[i]);
}
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(print_stack_trace);
/*
* Architectures that do not implement save_stack_trace_tsk get this
* weak alias and a once-per-bootup warning (whenever this facility
* is utilized - for example by procfs):
*/
__weak void
save_stack_trace_tsk(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stack_trace *trace)
{
WARN_ONCE(1, KERN_INFO "save_stack_trace_tsk() not implemented yet.\n");
}
Computing file changes ...