Revision 3adab6f3a7793253b22a4a7aae34221d19e0236a authored by Junio C Hamano on 09 February 2012, 21:30:52 UTC, committed by Junio C Hamano on 09 February 2012, 21:30:52 UTC
When the user explicitly asked us not to, don't launch an editor. But do everything else the same way as the "edit" case, i.e. leave the comment with verification result in the log template and record the mergesig in the resulting merge commit for later inspection. Based on initiail analysis by Jonathan Nieder. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
1 parent b5c9f1c
git-merge-resolve.sh
#!/bin/sh
#
# Copyright (c) 2005 Linus Torvalds
# Copyright (c) 2005 Junio C Hamano
#
# Resolve two trees, using enhanced multi-base read-tree.
# The first parameters up to -- are merge bases; the rest are heads.
bases= head= remotes= sep_seen=
for arg
do
case ",$sep_seen,$head,$arg," in
*,--,)
sep_seen=yes
;;
,yes,,*)
head=$arg
;;
,yes,*)
remotes="$remotes$arg "
;;
*)
bases="$bases$arg "
;;
esac
done
# Give up if we are given two or more remotes -- not handling octopus.
case "$remotes" in
?*' '?*)
exit 2 ;;
esac
# Give up if this is a baseless merge.
if test '' = "$bases"
then
exit 2
fi
git update-index -q --refresh
git read-tree -u -m --aggressive $bases $head $remotes || exit 2
echo "Trying simple merge."
if result_tree=$(git write-tree 2>/dev/null)
then
exit 0
else
echo "Simple merge failed, trying Automatic merge."
if git-merge-index -o git-merge-one-file -a
then
exit 0
else
exit 1
fi
fi
Computing file changes ...
