Revision 3ec804490a265f4c418a321428c12f3f18b7eff5 authored by Jeff King on 29 April 2017, 12:36:44 UTC, committed by Junio C Hamano on 05 May 2017, 03:07:27 UTC
When a remote server uses git-shell, the client side will
connect to it like:

  ssh server "git-upload-pack 'foo.git'"

and we literally exec ("git-upload-pack", "foo.git"). In
early versions of upload-pack and receive-pack, we took a
repository argument and nothing else. But over time they
learned to accept dashed options. If the user passes a
repository name that starts with a dash, the results are
confusing at best (we complain of a bogus option instead of
a non-existent repository) and malicious at worst (the user
can start an interactive pager via "--help").

We could pass "--" to the sub-process to make sure the
user's argument is interpreted as a branch name. I.e.:

  git-upload-pack -- -foo.git

But adding "--" automatically would make us inconsistent
with a normal shell (i.e., when git-shell is not in use),
where "-foo.git" would still be an error. For that case, the
client would have to specify the "--", but they can't do so
reliably, as existing versions of git-shell do not allow
more than a single argument.

The simplest thing is to simply disallow "-" at the start of
the repo name argument. This hasn't worked either with or
without git-shell since version 1.0.0, and nobody has
complained.

Note that this patch just applies to do_generic_cmd(), which
runs upload-pack, receive-pack, and upload-archive. There
are two other types of commands that git-shell runs:

  - do_cvs_cmd(), but this already restricts the argument to
    be the literal string "server"

  - admin-provided commands in the git-shell-commands
    directory. We'll pass along arbitrary arguments there,
    so these commands could have similar problems. But these
    commands might actually understand dashed arguments, so
    we cannot just block them here. It's up to the writer of
    the commands to make sure they are safe. With great
    power comes great responsibility.

Reported-by: Timo Schmid <tschmid@ernw.de>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
1 parent 7654286
Raw File
git-patch-id.txt
git-patch-id(1)
===============

NAME
----
git-patch-id - Compute unique ID for a patch

SYNOPSIS
--------
[verse]
'git patch-id' [--stable | --unstable] < <patch>

DESCRIPTION
-----------
A "patch ID" is nothing but a sum of SHA-1 of the file diffs associated with a
patch, with whitespace and line numbers ignored.  As such, it's "reasonably
stable", but at the same time also reasonably unique, i.e., two patches that
have the same "patch ID" are almost guaranteed to be the same thing.

IOW, you can use this thing to look for likely duplicate commits.

When dealing with 'git diff-tree' output, it takes advantage of
the fact that the patch is prefixed with the object name of the
commit, and outputs two 40-byte hexadecimal strings.  The first
string is the patch ID, and the second string is the commit ID.
This can be used to make a mapping from patch ID to commit ID.

OPTIONS
-------

--stable::
	Use a "stable" sum of hashes as the patch ID. With this option:
	 - Reordering file diffs that make up a patch does not affect the ID.
	   In particular, two patches produced by comparing the same two trees
	   with two different settings for "-O<orderfile>" result in the same
	   patch ID signature, thereby allowing the computed result to be used
	   as a key to index some meta-information about the change between
	   the two trees;

	 - Result is different from the value produced by git 1.9 and older
	   or produced when an "unstable" hash (see --unstable below) is
	   configured - even when used on a diff output taken without any use
	   of "-O<orderfile>", thereby making existing databases storing such
	   "unstable" or historical patch-ids unusable.

	This is the default if patchid.stable is set to true.

--unstable::
	Use an "unstable" hash as the patch ID. With this option,
	the result produced is compatible with the patch-id value produced
	by git 1.9 and older.  Users with pre-existing databases storing
	patch-ids produced by git 1.9 and older (who do not deal with reordered
	patches) may want to use this option.

	This is the default.

<patch>::
	The diff to create the ID of.

GIT
---
Part of the linkgit:git[1] suite
back to top