Revision 3f05402ac00ed6415b1df2b6823471e017817432 authored by Christian Couder on 13 January 2017, 14:44:05 UTC, committed by Junio C Hamano on 13 January 2017, 19:15:38 UTC
The following part of the description: git bisect (bad|new) [<rev>] git bisect (good|old) [<rev>...] may be a bit confusing, as a reader may wonder if instead it should be: git bisect (bad|good) [<rev>] git bisect (old|new) [<rev>...] Of course the difference between "[<rev>]" and "[<rev>...]" should hint that there is a good reason for the way it is. But we can further clarify and complete the description by adding "<term-new>" and "<term-old>" to the "bad|new" and "good|old" alternatives. Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
1 parent 06e6a74
bundle.h
#ifndef BUNDLE_H
#define BUNDLE_H
struct ref_list {
unsigned int nr, alloc;
struct ref_list_entry {
unsigned char sha1[20];
char *name;
} *list;
};
struct bundle_header {
struct ref_list prerequisites;
struct ref_list references;
};
int is_bundle(const char *path, int quiet);
int read_bundle_header(const char *path, struct bundle_header *header);
int create_bundle(struct bundle_header *header, const char *path,
int argc, const char **argv);
int verify_bundle(struct bundle_header *header, int verbose);
#define BUNDLE_VERBOSE 1
int unbundle(struct bundle_header *header, int bundle_fd, int flags);
int list_bundle_refs(struct bundle_header *header,
int argc, const char **argv);
#endif
![swh spinner](/static/img/swh-spinner.gif)
Computing file changes ...