Revision 3f05402ac00ed6415b1df2b6823471e017817432 authored by Christian Couder on 13 January 2017, 14:44:05 UTC, committed by Junio C Hamano on 13 January 2017, 19:15:38 UTC
The following part of the description: git bisect (bad|new) [<rev>] git bisect (good|old) [<rev>...] may be a bit confusing, as a reader may wonder if instead it should be: git bisect (bad|good) [<rev>] git bisect (old|new) [<rev>...] Of course the difference between "[<rev>]" and "[<rev>...]" should hint that there is a good reason for the way it is. But we can further clarify and complete the description by adding "<term-new>" and "<term-old>" to the "bad|new" and "good|old" alternatives. Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
1 parent 06e6a74
| File | Mode | Size |
|---|---|---|
| License.txt | -rw-r--r-- | 1.3 KB |
| Readme.txt | -rw-r--r-- | 6.3 KB |
| malloc.c.h | -rw-r--r-- | 191.7 KB |
| nedmalloc.c | -rw-r--r-- | 24.9 KB |
| nedmalloc.h | -rw-r--r-- | 6.6 KB |
Computing file changes ...
