Revision 408205a36b8518eef7837e123b255c79cafed8b0 authored by Zhongyi Xie on 26 June 2018, 22:56:26 UTC, committed by Facebook Github Bot on 26 June 2018, 22:57:26 UTC
Summary: Previously in https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/3601 bloom filter will only be checked if `prefix_extractor` in the mutable_cf_options matches the one found in the SST file. This PR relaxes the requirement by checking if all keys in the range [user_key, iterate_upper_bound) all share the same prefix after transforming using the BF in the SST file. If so, the bloom filter is considered compatible and will continue to be looked at. Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/3899 Differential Revision: D8157459 Pulled By: miasantreble fbshipit-source-id: 18d17cba56a1005162f8d5db7a27aba277089c41
1 parent 967aa81
ROCKSDB_LITE.md
# RocksDBLite
RocksDBLite is a project focused on mobile use cases, which don't need a lot of fancy things we've built for server workloads and they are very sensitive to binary size. For that reason, we added a compile flag ROCKSDB_LITE that comments out a lot of the nonessential code and keeps the binary lean.
Some examples of the features disabled by ROCKSDB_LITE:
* compiled-in support for LDB tool
* No backupable DB
* No support for replication (which we provide in form of TransactionalIterator)
* No advanced monitoring tools
* No special-purpose memtables that are highly optimized for specific use cases
* No Transactions
When adding a new big feature to RocksDB, please add ROCKSDB_LITE compile guard if:
* Nobody from mobile really needs your feature,
* Your feature is adding a lot of weight to the binary.
Don't add ROCKSDB_LITE compile guard if:
* It would introduce a lot of code complexity. Compile guards make code harder to read. It's a trade-off.
* Your feature is not adding a lot of weight.
If unsure, ask. :)
Computing file changes ...
