Revision 4229f6df508d9b02419c3da16c4f5aa7f2d6deae authored by Maysam Yabandeh on 12 October 2019, 03:28:36 UTC, committed by myabandeh on 16 October 2019, 17:51:46 UTC
Summary:
Partition Filters make use of a top-level index to find the partition that might have the bloom hash of the key. The index is with internal key format (before format version 3). Each partition contains the i) blooms of the keys in that range ii) bloom of prefixes of keys in that range, iii) the bloom of the prefix of the last key in the previous partition.
When ::SeekForPrev(key), we first perform a prefix bloom test on the SST file. The partition however is identified using the full internal key, rather than the prefix key. The reason is to be compatible with the internal key format of the top-level index. This creates a corner case. Example:
- SST k, Partition N: P1K1, P1K2
- SST k, top-level index: P1K2
- SST k+1, Partition 1: P2K1, P3K1
- SST k+1 top-level index: P3K1
When SeekForPrev(P1K3), it should point us to P1K2. However SST k top-level index would reject P1K3 since it is out of range.
One possible fix would be to search with the prefix P1 (instead of full internal key P1K3) however the details of properly comparing prefix with full internal key might get complicated. The fix we apply in this PR is to look into the last partition anyway even if the key is out of range.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/5907

Differential Revision: D17889918

Pulled By: maysamyabandeh

fbshipit-source-id: 169fd7b3c71dbc08808eae5a8340611ebe5bdc1e
1 parent 73a35c6
Raw File
CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
# Code of Conduct

## Our Pledge

In the interest of fostering an open and welcoming environment, we as
contributors and maintainers pledge to make participation in our project and
our community a harassment-free experience for everyone, regardless of age, body
size, disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression,
level of experience, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal
appearance, race, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.

## Our Standards

Examples of behavior that contributes to creating a positive environment
include:

* Using welcoming and inclusive language
* Being respectful of differing viewpoints and experiences
* Gracefully accepting constructive criticism
* Focusing on what is best for the community
* Showing empathy towards other community members

Examples of unacceptable behavior by participants include:

* The use of sexualized language or imagery and unwelcome sexual attention or
  advances
* Trolling, insulting/derogatory comments, and personal or political attacks
* Public or private harassment
* Publishing others' private information, such as a physical or electronic
  address, without explicit permission
* Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a
  professional setting

## Our Responsibilities

Project maintainers are responsible for clarifying the standards of acceptable
behavior and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in
response to any instances of unacceptable behavior.

Project maintainers have the right and responsibility to remove, edit, or
reject comments, commits, code, wiki edits, issues, and other contributions
that are not aligned to this Code of Conduct, or to ban temporarily or
permanently any contributor for other behaviors that they deem inappropriate,
threatening, offensive, or harmful.

## Scope

This Code of Conduct applies within all project spaces, and it also applies when
an individual is representing the project or its community in public spaces.
Examples of representing a project or community include using an official
project e-mail address, posting via an official social media account, or acting
as an appointed representative at an online or offline event. Representation of
a project may be further defined and clarified by project maintainers.

## Enforcement

Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
reported by contacting the project team at <opensource-conduct@fb.com>. All
complaints will be reviewed and investigated and will result in a response that
is deemed necessary and appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is
obligated to maintain confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.
Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

Project maintainers who do not follow or enforce the Code of Conduct in good
faith may face temporary or permanent repercussions as determined by other
members of the project's leadership.

## Attribution

This Code of Conduct is adapted from the [Contributor Covenant][homepage], version 1.4,
available at https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/1/4/code-of-conduct.html

[homepage]: https://www.contributor-covenant.org

For answers to common questions about this code of conduct, see
https://www.contributor-covenant.org/faq

back to top