Revision 4e1dc640097d4e389f12bcf12f75cdf7e4ceae61 authored by Junio C Hamano on 14 April 2006, 22:57:32 UTC, committed by Junio C Hamano on 15 April 2006, 04:52:50 UTC
I noticed bisect does not work well without both good and bad.
Running this script in git.git repository would give you quite
different results:

	#!/bin/sh
        initial=e83c5163316f89bfbde7d9ab23ca2e25604af290

        mid0=`git rev-list --bisect ^$initial --all`

        git rev-list $mid0 | wc -l
        git rev-list ^$mid0 --all | wc -l

        mid1=`git rev-list --bisect --all`

        git rev-list $mid1 | wc -l
        git rev-list ^$mid1 --all | wc -l

The $initial commit is the very first commit you made.  The
first midpoint bisects things evenly as designed, but the latter
does not.

The reason I got interested in this was because I was wondering
if something like the following would help people converting a
huge repository from foreign SCM, or preparing a repository to
be fetched over plain dumb HTTP only:

        #!/bin/sh

        N=4
        P=.git/objects/pack
        bottom=

        while test 0 \< $N
        do
                N=$((N-1))
                if test -z "$bottom"
                then
                        newbottom=`git rev-list --bisect --all`
                else
                        newbottom=`git rev-list --bisect ^$bottom --all`
                fi
                if test -z "$bottom"
                then
                        rev_list="$newbottom"
                elif test 0 = $N
                then
                        rev_list="^$bottom --all"
                else
                        rev_list="^$bottom $newbottom"
                fi
                p=$(git rev-list --unpacked --objects $rev_list |
                    git pack-objects $P/pack)
                git show-index <$P/pack-$p.idx | wc -l
                bottom=$newbottom
        done

The idea is to pack older half of the history to one pack, then
older half of the remaining history to another, to continue a
few times, using finer granularity as we get closer to the tip.

This may not matter, since for a truly huge history, running
bisect number of times could be quite time consuming, and we
might be better off running "git rev-list --all" once into a
temporary file, and manually pick cut-off points from the
resulting list of commits.  After all we are talking about
"approximately half" for such an usage, and older history does
not matter much.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>

1 parent 40c2fe0
Raw File
annotate-tests.sh
# This file isn't used as a test script directly, instead it is
# sourced from t8001-annotate.sh and t8001-blame.sh.

check_count () {
	head=
	case "$1" in -h) head="$2"; shift; shift ;; esac
	$PROG file $head | perl -e '
		my %expect = (@ARGV);
		my %count = ();
		while (<STDIN>) {
			if (/^[0-9a-f]+\t\(([^\t]+)\t/) {
				my $author = $1;
				for ($author) { s/^\s*//; s/\s*$//; }
				if (exists $expect{$author}) {
					$count{$author}++;
				}
			}
		}
		my $bad = 0;
		while (my ($author, $count) = each %count) {
			my $ok;
			if ($expect{$author} != $count) {
				$bad = 1;
				$ok = "bad";
			}
			else {
				$ok = "good";
			}
			print STDERR "Author $author (expected $expect{$author}, attributed $count) $ok\n";
		}
		exit($bad);
	' "$@"
}

test_expect_success \
    'prepare reference tree' \
    'echo "1A quick brown fox jumps over the" >file &&
     echo "lazy dog" >>file &&
     git add file
     GIT_AUTHOR_NAME="A" git commit -a -m "Initial."'

test_expect_success \
    'check all lines blamed on A' \
    'check_count A 2'

test_expect_success \
    'Setup new lines blamed on B' \
    'echo "2A quick brown fox jumps over the" >>file &&
     echo "lazy dog" >> file &&
     GIT_AUTHOR_NAME="B" git commit -a -m "Second."'

test_expect_success \
    'Two lines blamed on A, two on B' \
    'check_count A 2 B 2'

test_expect_success \
    'merge-setup part 1' \
    'git checkout -b branch1 master &&
     echo "3A slow green fox jumps into the" >> file &&
     echo "well." >> file &&
     GIT_AUTHOR_NAME="B1" git commit -a -m "Branch1-1"'

test_expect_success \
    'Two lines blamed on A, two on B, two on B1' \
    'check_count A 2 B 2 B1 2'

test_expect_success \
    'merge-setup part 2' \
    'git checkout -b branch2 master &&
     sed -e "s/2A quick brown/4A quick brown lazy dog/" < file > file.new &&
     mv file.new file &&
     GIT_AUTHOR_NAME="B2" git commit -a -m "Branch2-1"'

test_expect_success \
    'Two lines blamed on A, one on B, one on B2' \
    'check_count A 2 B 1 B2 1'

test_expect_success \
    'merge-setup part 3' \
    'git pull . branch1'

test_expect_success \
    'Two lines blamed on A, one on B, two on B1, one on B2' \
    'check_count A 2 B 1 B1 2 B2 1'

test_expect_success \
    'Annotating an old revision works' \
    'check_count -h master A 2 B 2'

test_expect_success \
    'Annotating an old revision works' \
    'check_count -h master^ A 2'

test_expect_success \
    'merge-setup part 4' \
    'echo "evil merge." >>file &&
     EDITOR=: VISUAL=: git commit -a --amend'

test_expect_success \
    'Two lines blamed on A, one on B, two on B1, one on B2, one on A U Thor' \
    'check_count A 2 B 1 B1 2 B2 1 "A U Thor" 1'

test_expect_success \
    'an incomplete line added' \
    'echo "incomplete" | tr -d "\\012" >>file &&
    GIT_AUTHOR_NAME="C" git commit -a -m "Incomplete"'

test_expect_success \
    'With incomplete lines.' \
    'check_count A 2 B 1 B1 2 B2 1 "A U Thor" 1 C 1'

test_expect_success \
    'some edit' \
    'mv file file1 &&
     sed -e 1d -e "5s/3A/99/" file1 >file &&
     rm -f file1 &&
    GIT_AUTHOR_NAME="D" git commit -a -m "edit"'

test_expect_success \
    'some edit' \
    'check_count A 1 B 1 B1 1 B2 1 "A U Thor" 1 C 1 D 1'
back to top