Revision 5885b9b3f030f9b430f6b1c7fa396c885033f2f8 authored by Linus Torvalds on 16 December 2011, 19:14:42 UTC, committed by Linus Torvalds on 16 December 2011, 19:14:42 UTC
* 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tiwai/sound: ALSA: HDA: Use LPIB Position fix for Intel SCH Poulsbo ALSA: hda: fix mute led polarity for HP laptops with buggy BIOS ALSA: HDA: Set position fix to LPIB for an Atom/Poulsbo based device ASoC: Fix hx4700 error handling to free gpios if snd_soc_register_card fails ASoC: WM8958: correctly show firmware magic on mismatch ASoC: mxs: Add appropriate MODULE_ALIAS() ASoC: mxs: Add missing MODULE_LICENSE("GPL") ASoC: Fix WM8996 24.576MHz clock operation ASoC: Include linux/module.h for smdk2443_wm9710 ASoC: Fix a typo in jive_wm8750 ASoC: Fix build dependency for SND_SOC_JZ4740_CODEC ASoC: Include linux/io.h for jz4740 codec
cpu-load.txt
CPU load
--------
Linux exports various bits of information via `/proc/stat' and
`/proc/uptime' that userland tools, such as top(1), use to calculate
the average time system spent in a particular state, for example:
$ iostat
Linux 2.6.18.3-exp (linmac) 02/20/2007
avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle
10.01 0.00 2.92 5.44 0.00 81.63
...
Here the system thinks that over the default sampling period the
system spent 10.01% of the time doing work in user space, 2.92% in the
kernel, and was overall 81.63% of the time idle.
In most cases the `/proc/stat' information reflects the reality quite
closely, however due to the nature of how/when the kernel collects
this data sometimes it can not be trusted at all.
So how is this information collected? Whenever timer interrupt is
signalled the kernel looks what kind of task was running at this
moment and increments the counter that corresponds to this tasks
kind/state. The problem with this is that the system could have
switched between various states multiple times between two timer
interrupts yet the counter is incremented only for the last state.
Example
-------
If we imagine the system with one task that periodically burns cycles
in the following manner:
time line between two timer interrupts
|--------------------------------------|
^ ^
|_ something begins working |
|_ something goes to sleep
(only to be awaken quite soon)
In the above situation the system will be 0% loaded according to the
`/proc/stat' (since the timer interrupt will always happen when the
system is executing the idle handler), but in reality the load is
closer to 99%.
One can imagine many more situations where this behavior of the kernel
will lead to quite erratic information inside `/proc/stat'.
/* gcc -o hog smallhog.c */
#include <time.h>
#include <limits.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <sys/time.h>
#define HIST 10
static volatile sig_atomic_t stop;
static void sighandler (int signr)
{
(void) signr;
stop = 1;
}
static unsigned long hog (unsigned long niters)
{
stop = 0;
while (!stop && --niters);
return niters;
}
int main (void)
{
int i;
struct itimerval it = { .it_interval = { .tv_sec = 0, .tv_usec = 1 },
.it_value = { .tv_sec = 0, .tv_usec = 1 } };
sigset_t set;
unsigned long v[HIST];
double tmp = 0.0;
unsigned long n;
signal (SIGALRM, &sighandler);
setitimer (ITIMER_REAL, &it, NULL);
hog (ULONG_MAX);
for (i = 0; i < HIST; ++i) v[i] = ULONG_MAX - hog (ULONG_MAX);
for (i = 0; i < HIST; ++i) tmp += v[i];
tmp /= HIST;
n = tmp - (tmp / 3.0);
sigemptyset (&set);
sigaddset (&set, SIGALRM);
for (;;) {
hog (n);
sigwait (&set, &i);
}
return 0;
}
References
----------
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/12/6
Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt (1.8)
Thanks
------
Con Kolivas, Pavel Machek
![swh spinner](/static/img/swh-spinner.gif)
Computing file changes ...