Revision 58e3dd21f68c5eec945e7ddd4690733bd0103ce5 authored by Junio C Hamano on 11 December 2015, 19:14:38 UTC, committed by Junio C Hamano on 11 December 2015, 19:14:38 UTC
mark_tree_uninteresting() has code to handle the case where it gets passed a NULL pointer in its 'tree' parameter, but the function had 'object = &tree->object' assignment before checking if tree is NULL. This gives a compiler an excuse to declare that tree will never be NULL and apply a wrong optimization. Avoid it. * sn/null-pointer-arith-in-mark-tree-uninteresting: revision.c: fix possible null pointer arithmetic
blob.c
#include "cache.h"
#include "blob.h"
const char *blob_type = "blob";
struct blob *lookup_blob(const unsigned char *sha1)
{
struct object *obj = lookup_object(sha1);
if (!obj)
return create_object(sha1, alloc_blob_node());
return object_as_type(obj, OBJ_BLOB, 0);
}
int parse_blob_buffer(struct blob *item, void *buffer, unsigned long size)
{
item->object.parsed = 1;
return 0;
}
Computing file changes ...
