Revision 66cb3a2d7ad0d0e9af4d3430a4f2a32ffb9ac098 authored by David Arcari on 26 May 2022, 20:31:40 UTC, committed by Hans de Goede on 10 June 2022, 19:59:08 UTC
The probe function pmt_crashlog_probe() may incorrectly reference
the 'priv->entry array' as it uses 'i' to reference the array instead
of 'priv->num_entries' as it should.  This is similar to the problem
that was addressed in pmt_telemetry_probe via commit 2cdfa0c20d58
("platform/x86/intel: Fix 'rmmod pmt_telemetry' panic").

Cc: "David E. Box" <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: Mark Gross <markgross@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: David Arcari <darcari@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: David E. Box <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220526203140.339120-1-darcari@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
1 parent b9c29f3
Raw File
list_debug.c
/*
 * Copyright 2006, Red Hat, Inc., Dave Jones
 * Released under the General Public License (GPL).
 *
 * This file contains the linked list validation for DEBUG_LIST.
 */

#include <linux/export.h>
#include <linux/list.h>
#include <linux/bug.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/rculist.h>

/*
 * Check that the data structures for the list manipulations are reasonably
 * valid. Failures here indicate memory corruption (and possibly an exploit
 * attempt).
 */

bool __list_add_valid(struct list_head *new, struct list_head *prev,
		      struct list_head *next)
{
	if (CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(next->prev != prev,
			"list_add corruption. next->prev should be prev (%px), but was %px. (next=%px).\n",
			prev, next->prev, next) ||
	    CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(prev->next != next,
			"list_add corruption. prev->next should be next (%px), but was %px. (prev=%px).\n",
			next, prev->next, prev) ||
	    CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(new == prev || new == next,
			"list_add double add: new=%px, prev=%px, next=%px.\n",
			new, prev, next))
		return false;

	return true;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__list_add_valid);

bool __list_del_entry_valid(struct list_head *entry)
{
	struct list_head *prev, *next;

	prev = entry->prev;
	next = entry->next;

	if (CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(next == LIST_POISON1,
			"list_del corruption, %px->next is LIST_POISON1 (%px)\n",
			entry, LIST_POISON1) ||
	    CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(prev == LIST_POISON2,
			"list_del corruption, %px->prev is LIST_POISON2 (%px)\n",
			entry, LIST_POISON2) ||
	    CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(prev->next != entry,
			"list_del corruption. prev->next should be %px, but was %px. (prev=%px)\n",
			entry, prev->next, prev) ||
	    CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(next->prev != entry,
			"list_del corruption. next->prev should be %px, but was %px. (next=%px)\n",
			entry, next->prev, next))
		return false;

	return true;

}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__list_del_entry_valid);
back to top