Revision 6c74a4dd8af06788ced8ee6d9730bb48d3041c82 authored by Simeon Schaub on 24 March 2021, 20:28:26 UTC, committed by Simeon Schaub on 27 March 2021, 23:05:40 UTC
One gotcha is that defining a second opaque closure with the same name as the first will just define a new opaque closure. This is of course different to how method definitions usually work, but since opaque closures don't do dispatch this seems the most sensible to me. Another thing to think about is whether we want to make the binding a constant if the opaque closure is defined in global scope.
1 parent 712abb0
Computing file changes ...
