Revision 73223e4e2e3867ebf033a5a8eb2e5df0158ccc99 authored by zhong jiang on 18 August 2017, 22:16:24 UTC, committed by Linus Torvalds on 18 August 2017, 22:32:02 UTC
I hit a use after free issue when executing trinity and repoduced it
with KASAN enabled. The related call trace is as follows.
BUG: KASan: use after free in SyS_get_mempolicy+0x3c8/0x960 at addr ffff8801f582d766
Read of size 2 by task syz-executor1/798
INFO: Allocated in mpol_new.part.2+0x74/0x160 age=3 cpu=1 pid=799
__slab_alloc+0x768/0x970
kmem_cache_alloc+0x2e7/0x450
mpol_new.part.2+0x74/0x160
mpol_new+0x66/0x80
SyS_mbind+0x267/0x9f0
system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
INFO: Freed in __mpol_put+0x2b/0x40 age=4 cpu=1 pid=799
__slab_free+0x495/0x8e0
kmem_cache_free+0x2f3/0x4c0
__mpol_put+0x2b/0x40
SyS_mbind+0x383/0x9f0
system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
INFO: Slab 0xffffea0009cb8dc0 objects=23 used=8 fp=0xffff8801f582de40 flags=0x200000000004080
INFO: Object 0xffff8801f582d760 @offset=5984 fp=0xffff8801f582d600
Bytes b4 ffff8801f582d750: ae 01 ff ff 00 00 00 00 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a ........ZZZZZZZZ
Object ffff8801f582d760: 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
Object ffff8801f582d770: 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b a5 kkkkkkk.
Redzone ffff8801f582d778: bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb ........
Padding ffff8801f582d8b8: 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a ZZZZZZZZ
Memory state around the buggy address:
ffff8801f582d600: fb fb fb fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc
ffff8801f582d680: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc
>ffff8801f582d700: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fb fb fb fc
!shared memory policy is not protected against parallel removal by other
thread which is normally protected by the mmap_sem. do_get_mempolicy,
however, drops the lock midway while we can still access it later.
Early premature up_read is a historical artifact from times when
put_user was called in this path see https://lwn.net/Articles/124754/
but that is gone since 8bccd85ffbaf ("[PATCH] Implement sys_* do_*
layering in the memory policy layer."). but when we have the the
current mempolicy ref count model. The issue was introduced
accordingly.
Fix the issue by removing the premature release.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1502950924-27521-1-git-send-email-zhongjiang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> [2.6+]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
1 parent da094e4
blk-mq-tag.h
#ifndef INT_BLK_MQ_TAG_H
#define INT_BLK_MQ_TAG_H
#include "blk-mq.h"
/*
* Tag address space map.
*/
struct blk_mq_tags {
unsigned int nr_tags;
unsigned int nr_reserved_tags;
atomic_t active_queues;
struct sbitmap_queue bitmap_tags;
struct sbitmap_queue breserved_tags;
struct request **rqs;
struct request **static_rqs;
struct list_head page_list;
};
extern struct blk_mq_tags *blk_mq_init_tags(unsigned int nr_tags, unsigned int reserved_tags, int node, int alloc_policy);
extern void blk_mq_free_tags(struct blk_mq_tags *tags);
extern unsigned int blk_mq_get_tag(struct blk_mq_alloc_data *data);
extern void blk_mq_put_tag(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
struct blk_mq_ctx *ctx, unsigned int tag);
extern bool blk_mq_has_free_tags(struct blk_mq_tags *tags);
extern int blk_mq_tag_update_depth(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
struct blk_mq_tags **tags,
unsigned int depth, bool can_grow);
extern void blk_mq_tag_wakeup_all(struct blk_mq_tags *tags, bool);
void blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter(struct request_queue *q, busy_iter_fn *fn,
void *priv);
static inline struct sbq_wait_state *bt_wait_ptr(struct sbitmap_queue *bt,
struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
{
if (!hctx)
return &bt->ws[0];
return sbq_wait_ptr(bt, &hctx->wait_index);
}
enum {
BLK_MQ_TAG_CACHE_MIN = 1,
BLK_MQ_TAG_CACHE_MAX = 64,
};
enum {
BLK_MQ_TAG_FAIL = -1U,
BLK_MQ_TAG_MIN = BLK_MQ_TAG_CACHE_MIN,
BLK_MQ_TAG_MAX = BLK_MQ_TAG_FAIL - 1,
};
extern bool __blk_mq_tag_busy(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *);
extern void __blk_mq_tag_idle(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *);
static inline bool blk_mq_tag_busy(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
{
if (!(hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_TAG_SHARED))
return false;
return __blk_mq_tag_busy(hctx);
}
static inline void blk_mq_tag_idle(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
{
if (!(hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_TAG_SHARED))
return;
__blk_mq_tag_idle(hctx);
}
/*
* This helper should only be used for flush request to share tag
* with the request cloned from, and both the two requests can't be
* in flight at the same time. The caller has to make sure the tag
* can't be freed.
*/
static inline void blk_mq_tag_set_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
unsigned int tag, struct request *rq)
{
hctx->tags->rqs[tag] = rq;
}
static inline bool blk_mq_tag_is_reserved(struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
unsigned int tag)
{
return tag < tags->nr_reserved_tags;
}
#endif
Computing file changes ...
