Revision 7765be2fec0f476fcd61812d5f9406b04c765020 authored by Paul E. McKenney on 14 July 2011, 19:24:11 UTC, committed by Paul E. McKenney on 20 July 2011, 04:38:52 UTC
The RCU_BOOST commits for TREE_PREEMPT_RCU introduced an other-task write to a new RCU_READ_UNLOCK_BOOSTED bit in the task_struct structure's ->rcu_read_unlock_special field, but, as noted by Steven Rostedt, without correctly synchronizing all accesses to ->rcu_read_unlock_special. This could result in bits in ->rcu_read_unlock_special being spuriously set and cleared due to conflicting accesses, which in turn could result in deadlocks between the rcu_node structure's ->lock and the scheduler's rq and pi locks. These deadlocks would result from RCU incorrectly believing that the just-ended RCU read-side critical section had been preempted and/or boosted. If that RCU read-side critical section was executed with either rq or pi locks held, RCU's ensuing (incorrect) calls to the scheduler would cause the scheduler to attempt to once again acquire the rq and pi locks, resulting in deadlock. More complex deadlock cycles are also possible, involving multiple rq and pi locks as well as locks from multiple rcu_node structures. This commit fixes synchronization by creating ->rcu_boosted field in task_struct that is accessed and modified only when holding the ->lock in the rcu_node structure on which the task is queued (on that rcu_node structure's ->blkd_tasks list). This results in tasks accessing only their own current->rcu_read_unlock_special fields, making unsynchronized access once again legal, and keeping the rcu_read_unlock() fastpath free of atomic instructions and memory barriers. The reason that the rcu_read_unlock() fastpath does not need to access the new current->rcu_boosted field is that this new field cannot be non-zero unless the RCU_READ_UNLOCK_BLOCKED bit is set in the current->rcu_read_unlock_special field. Therefore, rcu_read_unlock() need only test current->rcu_read_unlock_special: if that is zero, then current->rcu_boosted must also be zero. This bug does not affect TINY_PREEMPT_RCU because this implementation of RCU accesses current->rcu_read_unlock_special with irqs disabled, thus preventing races on the !SMP systems that TINY_PREEMPT_RCU runs on. Maybe-reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Maybe-reported-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Reported-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
1 parent 131906b
File | Mode | Size |
---|---|---|
Documentation | ||
arch | ||
block | ||
crypto | ||
drivers | ||
firmware | ||
fs | ||
include | ||
init | ||
ipc | ||
kernel | ||
lib | ||
mm | ||
net | ||
samples | ||
scripts | ||
security | ||
sound | ||
tools | ||
usr | ||
virt | ||
.gitignore | -rw-r--r-- | 966 bytes |
.mailmap | -rw-r--r-- | 4.2 KB |
COPYING | -rw-r--r-- | 18.3 KB |
CREDITS | -rw-r--r-- | 92.3 KB |
Kbuild | -rw-r--r-- | 2.4 KB |
Kconfig | -rw-r--r-- | 252 bytes |
MAINTAINERS | -rw-r--r-- | 190.6 KB |
Makefile | -rw-r--r-- | 52.2 KB |
README | -rw-r--r-- | 17.0 KB |
REPORTING-BUGS | -rw-r--r-- | 3.3 KB |
![swh spinner](/static/img/swh-spinner.gif)
Computing file changes ...