https://github.com/ElsevierSoftwareX/SOFTX_2019_219
Revision 78d7695e70694df479099377176af419ae0c1782 authored by Konrad Werys on 09 March 2019, 17:32:43 UTC, committed by Konrad Werys on 09 March 2019, 17:32:43 UTC
1 parent cd69cb0
Tip revision: 78d7695e70694df479099377176af419ae0c1782 authored by Konrad Werys on 09 March 2019, 17:32:43 UTC
first zip the data for the deployment, then clone the private repo
first zip the data for the deployment, then clone the private repo
Tip revision: 78d7695
notepad.md
# Different results from the configurations:
parameter_to_map: T1_SHMOLLI
functions_type: **FunctionsBasic/FunctionsShmolli**
fitting_method: LevMarVnl
max_function_evals: 4000
fTolerance: 1e-12
sign_calc_method: MagPhase
start_point_calc_method: Default
FunctionsBasic: 10s and seemingly correct results
FunctionsShmolli: 2.2s and wrong results
parameter_to_map: T1_SHMOLLI
functions_type: FunctionsShmolli
fitting_method: LevMarVnl
max_function_evals: 4000
fTolerance: 1e-12
sign_calc_method: MagPhase
start_point_calc_method: **Default/StartPointSHMOLLI**
Default: 2.2s and wrong results
StartPointSHMOLLI: 10s and seemingly correct results
# 5 vs 7 samples
5 samples are calculated way slower. Maybe playing with fmax and maxIter would reduce the time?
Computing file changes ...
