Revision 7b66dfcc6e1e1f018492619c3d0fc432b6b54272 authored by Liang He on 12 July 2022, 09:56:23 UTC, committed by Marc Kleine-Budde on 20 July 2022, 08:20:19 UTC
We should use of_node_put() for the reference returned by of_get_child_by_name() which has increased the refcount. Fixes: 45721c406dcf ("can: rcar_canfd: Add support for r8a779a0 SoC") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220712095623.364287-1-windhl@126.com Signed-off-by: Liang He <windhl@126.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
1 parent db87c00
list_debug.c
/*
* Copyright 2006, Red Hat, Inc., Dave Jones
* Released under the General Public License (GPL).
*
* This file contains the linked list validation for DEBUG_LIST.
*/
#include <linux/export.h>
#include <linux/list.h>
#include <linux/bug.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/rculist.h>
/*
* Check that the data structures for the list manipulations are reasonably
* valid. Failures here indicate memory corruption (and possibly an exploit
* attempt).
*/
bool __list_add_valid(struct list_head *new, struct list_head *prev,
struct list_head *next)
{
if (CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(next->prev != prev,
"list_add corruption. next->prev should be prev (%px), but was %px. (next=%px).\n",
prev, next->prev, next) ||
CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(prev->next != next,
"list_add corruption. prev->next should be next (%px), but was %px. (prev=%px).\n",
next, prev->next, prev) ||
CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(new == prev || new == next,
"list_add double add: new=%px, prev=%px, next=%px.\n",
new, prev, next))
return false;
return true;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__list_add_valid);
bool __list_del_entry_valid(struct list_head *entry)
{
struct list_head *prev, *next;
prev = entry->prev;
next = entry->next;
if (CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(next == LIST_POISON1,
"list_del corruption, %px->next is LIST_POISON1 (%px)\n",
entry, LIST_POISON1) ||
CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(prev == LIST_POISON2,
"list_del corruption, %px->prev is LIST_POISON2 (%px)\n",
entry, LIST_POISON2) ||
CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(prev->next != entry,
"list_del corruption. prev->next should be %px, but was %px. (prev=%px)\n",
entry, prev->next, prev) ||
CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(next->prev != entry,
"list_del corruption. next->prev should be %px, but was %px. (next=%px)\n",
entry, next->prev, next))
return false;
return true;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__list_del_entry_valid);
![swh spinner](/static/img/swh-spinner.gif)
Computing file changes ...