Revision 8e5a257bfe42784519185a128cd17dc89fc00873 authored by Andrew Kryczka on 17 December 2016, 01:31:15 UTC, committed by Islam AbdelRahman on 17 December 2016, 01:48:27 UTC
Summary: seems it's expensive to check status since the underlying merge iterator checks status of all its children. so only do it when it's really necessary to get the status before invoking Next(), i.e., when we're advancing to get the first key in the next file. Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/1691 Differential Revision: D4343446 Pulled By: siying fbshipit-source-id: 70ab315
1 parent a0cdf54
ROCKSDB_LITE.md
# RocksDBLite
RocksDBLite is a project focused on mobile use cases, which don't need a lot of fancy things we've built for server workloads and they are very sensitive to binary size. For that reason, we added a compile flag ROCKSDB_LITE that comments out a lot of the nonessential code and keeps the binary lean.
Some examples of the features disabled by ROCKSDB_LITE:
* compiled-in support for LDB tool
* No backupable DB
* No support for replication (which we provide in form of TrasactionalIterator)
* No advanced monitoring tools
* No special-purpose memtables that are highly optimized for specific use cases
* No Transactions
When adding a new big feature to RocksDB, please add ROCKSDB_LITE compile guard if:
* Nobody from mobile really needs your feature,
* Your feature is adding a lot of weight to the binary.
Don't add ROCKSDB_LITE compile guard if:
* It would introduce a lot of code complexity. Compile guards make code harder to read. It's a trade-off.
* Your feature is not adding a lot of weight.
If unsure, ask. :)
Computing file changes ...
