Revision 92adeb616c9172dea9678f53ea6e5501fc4f4338 authored by Linus Torvalds on 13 July 2019, 22:07:02 UTC, committed by Linus Torvalds on 13 July 2019, 22:07:02 UTC
Pull IPMI updates from Corey Minyard:
 "Some small fixes for various things, nothing huge, mostly found by
  automated tools.

  Plus add a driver that allows Linux to act as an IPMB slave device, so
  it can be a satellite MC in an IPMI network"

* tag 'for-linus-5.3' of git://github.com/cminyard/linux-ipmi:
  docs: ipmb: place it at driver-api and convert to ReST
  fix platform_no_drv_owner.cocci warnings
  ipmi: ipmb: don't allocate i2c_client on stack
  ipmi: ipmb: Fix build error while CONFIG_I2C is set to m
  Add support for IPMB driver
  drivers: ipmi: Drop device reference
  ipmi_ssif: fix unexpected driver unregister warning
  ipmi_si: use bool type for initialized variable
  ipmi_si: fix unexpected driver unregister warning
2 parent s 43c95d3 + ac499fb
Raw File
list_debug.c
/*
 * Copyright 2006, Red Hat, Inc., Dave Jones
 * Released under the General Public License (GPL).
 *
 * This file contains the linked list validation for DEBUG_LIST.
 */

#include <linux/export.h>
#include <linux/list.h>
#include <linux/bug.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/rculist.h>

/*
 * Check that the data structures for the list manipulations are reasonably
 * valid. Failures here indicate memory corruption (and possibly an exploit
 * attempt).
 */

bool __list_add_valid(struct list_head *new, struct list_head *prev,
		      struct list_head *next)
{
	if (CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(next->prev != prev,
			"list_add corruption. next->prev should be prev (%px), but was %px. (next=%px).\n",
			prev, next->prev, next) ||
	    CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(prev->next != next,
			"list_add corruption. prev->next should be next (%px), but was %px. (prev=%px).\n",
			next, prev->next, prev) ||
	    CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(new == prev || new == next,
			"list_add double add: new=%px, prev=%px, next=%px.\n",
			new, prev, next))
		return false;

	return true;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__list_add_valid);

bool __list_del_entry_valid(struct list_head *entry)
{
	struct list_head *prev, *next;

	prev = entry->prev;
	next = entry->next;

	if (CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(next == LIST_POISON1,
			"list_del corruption, %px->next is LIST_POISON1 (%px)\n",
			entry, LIST_POISON1) ||
	    CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(prev == LIST_POISON2,
			"list_del corruption, %px->prev is LIST_POISON2 (%px)\n",
			entry, LIST_POISON2) ||
	    CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(prev->next != entry,
			"list_del corruption. prev->next should be %px, but was %px\n",
			entry, prev->next) ||
	    CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(next->prev != entry,
			"list_del corruption. next->prev should be %px, but was %px\n",
			entry, next->prev))
		return false;

	return true;

}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__list_del_entry_valid);
back to top