Skip to main content

Browse the archive

Revision 933bf40a5c6328b6c022b636f45a6f2c48c3838e authored by Linus Torvalds on 10 August 2007, 05:21:29 UTC, committed by Junio C Hamano on 10 August 2007, 09:30:44 UTC 
Start moving unpack-trees to "struct tree_desc"
 
This doesn't actually change any real code, but it changes the interface
to unpack_trees() to take an array of "struct tree_desc" entries, the same
way the tree-walk.c functions do.

The reason for this is that we would be much better off if we can do the
tree-unpacking using the generic "traverse_trees()" functionality instead
of having to the special "unpack" infrastructure.

This really is a pretty minimal diff, just to change the calling
convention. It passes all the tests, and looks sane. There were only two
users of "unpack_trees()": builtin-read-tree and merge-recursive, and I
tried to keep the changes minimal.

Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
1 parent 7efeb8f
Raw File
decorate.h 
#ifndef DECORATE_H
#define DECORATE_H

struct object_decoration {
	struct object *base;
	void *decoration;
};

struct decoration {
	const char *name;
	unsigned int size, nr;
	struct object_decoration *hash;
};

extern void *add_decoration(struct decoration *n, struct object *obj, void *decoration);
extern void *lookup_decoration(struct decoration *n, struct object *obj);

#endif
back to top