Skip to main content

Browse the archive

Revision 933bf40a5c6328b6c022b636f45a6f2c48c3838e authored by Linus Torvalds on 10 August 2007, 05:21:29 UTC, committed by Junio C Hamano on 10 August 2007, 09:30:44 UTC 
Start moving unpack-trees to "struct tree_desc"
 
This doesn't actually change any real code, but it changes the interface
to unpack_trees() to take an array of "struct tree_desc" entries, the same
way the tree-walk.c functions do.

The reason for this is that we would be much better off if we can do the
tree-unpacking using the generic "traverse_trees()" functionality instead
of having to the special "unpack" infrastructure.

This really is a pretty minimal diff, just to change the calling
convention. It passes all the tests, and looks sane. There were only two
users of "unpack_trees()": builtin-read-tree and merge-recursive, and I
tried to keep the changes minimal.

Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
1 parent 7efeb8f
Raw File
test-date.c 
#include "cache.h"

int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
	int i;

	for (i = 1; i < argc; i++) {
		char result[100];
		time_t t;

		memcpy(result, "bad", 4);
		parse_date(argv[i], result, sizeof(result));
		t = strtoul(result, NULL, 0);
		printf("%s -> %s -> %s", argv[i], result, ctime(&t));

		t = approxidate(argv[i]);
		printf("%s -> %s\n", argv[i], ctime(&t));
	}
	return 0;
}
back to top