Revision 94b3dd0f7bb393d93e84a173b1df9b8b64c83ac4 authored by Greg Thelen on 04 June 2010, 21:15:03 UTC, committed by Linus Torvalds on 04 June 2010, 22:21:45 UTC
Child groups should have a greater depth than their parents. Prior to this change, the parent would incorrectly report zero memory usage for child cgroups when use_hierarchy is enabled. test script: mount -t cgroup none /cgroups -o memory cd /cgroups mkdir cg1 echo 1 > cg1/memory.use_hierarchy mkdir cg1/cg11 echo $$ > cg1/cg11/tasks dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/foo bs=1M count=1 echo echo CHILD grep cache cg1/cg11/memory.stat echo echo PARENT grep cache cg1/memory.stat echo $$ > tasks rmdir cg1/cg11 cg1 cd / umount /cgroups Using fae9c79, a recent patch that changed alloc_css_id() depth computation, the parent incorrectly reports zero usage: root@ubuntu:~# ./test 1+0 records in 1+0 records out 1048576 bytes (1.0 MB) copied, 0.0151844 s, 69.1 MB/s CHILD cache 1048576 total_cache 1048576 PARENT cache 0 total_cache 0 With this patch, the parent correctly includes child usage: root@ubuntu:~# ./test 1+0 records in 1+0 records out 1048576 bytes (1.0 MB) copied, 0.0136827 s, 76.6 MB/s CHILD cache 1052672 total_cache 1052672 PARENT cache 0 total_cache 1052672 Signed-off-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Acked-by: Paul Menage <menage@google.com> Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Acked-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> [2.6.34.x] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
1 parent 007d086
REPORTING-BUGS
[Some of this is taken from Frohwalt Egerer's original linux-kernel FAQ]
What follows is a suggested procedure for reporting Linux bugs. You
aren't obliged to use the bug reporting format, it is provided as a guide
to the kind of information that can be useful to developers - no more.
If the failure includes an "OOPS:" type message in your log or on
screen please read "Documentation/oops-tracing.txt" before posting your
bug report. This explains what you should do with the "Oops" information
to make it useful to the recipient.
Send the output to the maintainer of the kernel area that seems to
be involved with the problem, and cc the relevant mailing list. Don't
worry too much about getting the wrong person. If you are unsure send it
to the person responsible for the code relevant to what you were doing.
If it occurs repeatably try and describe how to recreate it. That is
worth even more than the oops itself. The list of maintainers and
mailing lists is in the MAINTAINERS file in this directory. If you
know the file name that causes the problem you can use the following
command in this directory to find some of the maintainers of that file:
perl scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f <filename>
If it is a security bug, please copy the Security Contact listed
in the MAINTAINERS file. They can help coordinate bugfix and disclosure.
See Documentation/SecurityBugs for more information.
If you are totally stumped as to whom to send the report, send it to
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org. (For more information on the linux-kernel
mailing list see http://www.tux.org/lkml/).
This is a suggested format for a bug report sent to the Linux kernel mailing
list. Having a standardized bug report form makes it easier for you not to
overlook things, and easier for the developers to find the pieces of
information they're really interested in. Don't feel you have to follow it.
First run the ver_linux script included as scripts/ver_linux, which
reports the version of some important subsystems. Run this script with
the command "sh scripts/ver_linux".
Use that information to fill in all fields of the bug report form, and
post it to the mailing list with a subject of "PROBLEM: <one line
summary from [1.]>" for easy identification by the developers.
[1.] One line summary of the problem:
[2.] Full description of the problem/report:
[3.] Keywords (i.e., modules, networking, kernel):
[4.] Kernel information
[4.1.] Kernel version (from /proc/version):
[4.2.] Kernel .config file:
[5.] Most recent kernel version which did not have the bug:
[6.] Output of Oops.. message (if applicable) with symbolic information
resolved (see Documentation/oops-tracing.txt)
[7.] A small shell script or example program which triggers the
problem (if possible)
[8.] Environment
[8.1.] Software (add the output of the ver_linux script here)
[8.2.] Processor information (from /proc/cpuinfo):
[8.3.] Module information (from /proc/modules):
[8.4.] Loaded driver and hardware information (/proc/ioports, /proc/iomem)
[8.5.] PCI information ('lspci -vvv' as root)
[8.6.] SCSI information (from /proc/scsi/scsi)
[8.7.] Other information that might be relevant to the problem
(please look in /proc and include all information that you
think to be relevant):
[X.] Other notes, patches, fixes, workarounds:
Thank you
![swh spinner](/static/img/swh-spinner.gif)
Computing file changes ...