Revision a5a1d1c2914b5316924c7893eb683a5420ebd3be authored by Thomas Gleixner on 21 December 2016, 19:32:01 UTC, committed by Thomas Gleixner on 25 December 2016, 10:04:12 UTC
There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is unambiguous. Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script: @rem@ @@ -typedef u64 cycle_t; @fix@ typedef cycle_t; @@ -cycle_t +u64 Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
1 parent 7c0f6ba
