Revision a6a9944140bbb336146d0d868429cb01839375c7 authored by Dmitry Parfenchik on 30 August 2017, 08:42:15 UTC, committed by Sean Owen on 30 August 2017, 08:42:15 UTC
## This is a backport of PR #18783 to the latest released branch 2.2.

## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

As described in JIRA ticket, History page is taking ~1min to load for cases when amount of jobs is 10k+.
Most of the time is currently being spent on DOM manipulations and all additional costs implied by this (browser repaints and reflows).
PR's goal is not to change any behavior but to optimize time of History UI rendering:

1. The most costly operation is setting `innerHTML` for `duration` column within a loop, which is [extremely unperformant](https://jsperf.com/jquery-append-vs-html-list-performance/24). [Refactoring ](https://github.com/criteo-forks/spark/commit/b7e56eef4d66af977bd05af58a81e14faf33c211) this helped to get page load time **down to 10-15s**

2. Second big gain bringing page load time **down to 4s** was [was achieved](https://github.com/criteo-forks/spark/commit/3630ca212baa94d60c5fe7e4109cf6da26288cec) by detaching table's DOM before parsing it with DataTables jQuery plugin.

3. Another chunk of improvements ([1]https://github.com/criteo-forks/spark/commit/aeeeeb520d156a7293a707aa6bc053a2f83b9ac2), [2](https://github.com/criteo-forks/spark/commit/e25be9a66b018ba0cc53884f242469b515cb2bf4), [3](https://github.com/criteo-forks/spark/commit/91697079a29138b7581e64f2aa79247fa1a4e4af)) was focused on removing unnecessary DOM manipulations that in total contributed ~250ms to page load time.

## How was this patch tested?

Tested by existing Selenium tests in `org.apache.spark.deploy.history.HistoryServerSuite`.

Changes were also tested on Criteo's spark-2.1 fork with 20k+ number of rows in the table, reducing load time to 4s.

Author: Dmitry Parfenchik <d.parfenchik@criteo.com>

Closes #18860 from 2ooom/history-ui-perf-fix-2.2.
1 parent 917fe66
History

README.md

back to top