Revision a82c25c366b0963d33ddf699196e6cf57f6d89b1 authored by Florian Westphal on 08 March 2022, 12:52:11 UTC, committed by Florian Westphal on 08 March 2022, 12:52:11 UTC
This reverts commit 878aed8db324bec64f3c3f956e64d5ae7375a5de.

This change breaks existing setups where conntrack is used with
asymmetric paths.

In these cases, the NAT transformation occurs on the syn-ack instead of
the syn:

1. SYN    x:12345 -> y -> 443 // sent by initiator, receiverd by responder
2. SYNACK y:443 -> x:12345 // First packet seen by conntrack, as sent by responder
3. tuple_force_port_remap() gets called, sees:
  'tcp from 443 to port 12345 NAT' -> pick a new source port, inititor receives
4. SYNACK y:$RANDOM -> x:12345   // connection is never established

While its possible to avoid the breakage with NOTRACK rules, a kernel
update should not break working setups.

An alternative to the revert is to augment conntrack to tag
mid-stream connections plus more code in the nat core to skip NAT
for such connections, however, this leads to more interaction/integration
between conntrack and NAT.

Therefore, revert, users will need to add explicit nat rules to avoid
port shadowing.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netfilter-devel/20220302105908.GA5852@breakpoint.cc/#R
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051413
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
1 parent f8e9bd3
Raw File
atomic_bitops.txt
=============
Atomic bitops
=============

While our bitmap_{}() functions are non-atomic, we have a number of operations
operating on single bits in a bitmap that are atomic.


API
---

The single bit operations are:

Non-RMW ops:

  test_bit()

RMW atomic operations without return value:

  {set,clear,change}_bit()
  clear_bit_unlock()

RMW atomic operations with return value:

  test_and_{set,clear,change}_bit()
  test_and_set_bit_lock()

Barriers:

  smp_mb__{before,after}_atomic()


All RMW atomic operations have a '__' prefixed variant which is non-atomic.


SEMANTICS
---------

Non-atomic ops:

In particular __clear_bit_unlock() suffers the same issue as atomic_set(),
which is why the generic version maps to clear_bit_unlock(), see atomic_t.txt.


RMW ops:

The test_and_{}_bit() operations return the original value of the bit.


ORDERING
--------

Like with atomic_t, the rule of thumb is:

 - non-RMW operations are unordered;

 - RMW operations that have no return value are unordered;

 - RMW operations that have a return value are fully ordered.

 - RMW operations that are conditional are unordered on FAILURE,
   otherwise the above rules apply. In the case of test_and_{}_bit() operations,
   if the bit in memory is unchanged by the operation then it is deemed to have
   failed.

Except for a successful test_and_set_bit_lock() which has ACQUIRE semantics and
clear_bit_unlock() which has RELEASE semantics.

Since a platform only has a single means of achieving atomic operations
the same barriers as for atomic_t are used, see atomic_t.txt.

back to top