Revision a87ef76f85c8c42fa15329ea53adda4793bf9686 authored by Mishal Shah on 27 August 2019, 23:26:43 UTC, committed by GitHub on 27 August 2019, 23:26:43 UTC
2 parent s 148ea44 + 4d66676
Raw File
conditional_conformances_fixit.swift.result
// RUN: %target-typecheck-verify-swift -emit-fixits-path %t.remap -fixit-all -diagnostics-editor-mode
// RUN: c-arcmt-test %t.remap | arcmt-test -verify-transformed-files %s.result

protocol P1 {}
protocol P2: P1 {}


struct S1<T> {}

extension S1: P1 where T: P1 {
    <#witnesses#>
}

extension S1: P1 where <#requirements#> {
    <#witnesses#>
}

extension S1: P2 where T: P1 {}
// expected-error@-1 {{conditional conformance of type 'S1<T>' to protocol 'P2' does not imply conformance to inherited protocol 'P1'}}
// expected-note@-2 {{did you mean to explicitly state the conformance with the same bounds?}}
// expected-note@-3 {{did you mean to explicitly state the conformance with different bounds?}}

protocol P3 {
    associatedtype X
}
struct S2<T, U, V: P3> {}

extension S2: P1 where T: P1, U: P1, V.X: P1 {
    <#witnesses#>
}

extension S2: P1 where T: P2, U: P2, V.X: P2 {
    <#witnesses#>
}

extension S2: P1 where <#requirements#> {
    <#witnesses#>
}

extension S2: P2 where T: P2, U: P2, V.X: P2 {}
// expected-error@-1 {{conditional conformance of type 'S2<T, U, V>' to protocol 'P2' does not imply conformance to inherited protocol 'P1'}}
// expected-note@-2 {{did you mean to explicitly state the conformance with relaxed bounds?}}
// expected-note@-3 {{did you mean to explicitly state the conformance with the same bounds?}}
// expected-note@-4 {{did you mean to explicitly state the conformance with different bounds?}}


struct S3<T, U, V: P3> {}

extension S3: P1 where T: P2, U: P2, V.X == Int {
    <#witnesses#>
}

extension S3: P1 where <#requirements#> {
    <#witnesses#>
}

extension S3: P2 where T: P2, U: P2, V.X == Int {}
// expected-error@-1 {{conditional conformance of type 'S3<T, U, V>' to protocol 'P2' does not imply conformance to inherited protocol 'P1'}}
// expected-note@-2 {{did you mean to explicitly state the conformance with the same bounds?}}
// expected-note@-3 {{did you mean to explicitly state the conformance with different bounds?}}


struct S4<T, U, V: P3> {}

extension S4: P1 where T: P2, U: P3, V.X: P2 {
    <#witnesses#>
}

extension S4: P1 where <#requirements#> {
    <#witnesses#>
}

extension S4: P2 where T: P2, U: P3, V.X: P2 {}
// expected-error@-1 {{conditional conformance of type 'S4<T, U, V>' to protocol 'P2' does not imply conformance to inherited protocol 'P1'}}
// expected-note@-2 {{did you mean to explicitly state the conformance with the same bounds?}}
// expected-note@-3 {{did you mean to explicitly state the conformance with different bounds?}}

back to top