Revision b112166a894db446f47a8c31781b037f28ac1721 authored by Daniel Vetter on 28 October 2021, 17:08:57 UTC, committed by Dave Airlie on 28 October 2021, 18:49:11 UTC
Somehow we only have a list of subdirectories, which apparently made
it harder for folks to find the gpu maintainers. Fix that.

References: https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/YXrAAZlxxStNFG%2FK@phenom.ffwll.local/
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211028170857.4029606-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
1 parent 946ca97
Raw File
atomic_bitops.txt
=============
Atomic bitops
=============

While our bitmap_{}() functions are non-atomic, we have a number of operations
operating on single bits in a bitmap that are atomic.


API
---

The single bit operations are:

Non-RMW ops:

  test_bit()

RMW atomic operations without return value:

  {set,clear,change}_bit()
  clear_bit_unlock()

RMW atomic operations with return value:

  test_and_{set,clear,change}_bit()
  test_and_set_bit_lock()

Barriers:

  smp_mb__{before,after}_atomic()


All RMW atomic operations have a '__' prefixed variant which is non-atomic.


SEMANTICS
---------

Non-atomic ops:

In particular __clear_bit_unlock() suffers the same issue as atomic_set(),
which is why the generic version maps to clear_bit_unlock(), see atomic_t.txt.


RMW ops:

The test_and_{}_bit() operations return the original value of the bit.


ORDERING
--------

Like with atomic_t, the rule of thumb is:

 - non-RMW operations are unordered;

 - RMW operations that have no return value are unordered;

 - RMW operations that have a return value are fully ordered.

 - RMW operations that are conditional are unordered on FAILURE,
   otherwise the above rules apply. In the case of test_and_{}_bit() operations,
   if the bit in memory is unchanged by the operation then it is deemed to have
   failed.

Except for a successful test_and_set_bit_lock() which has ACQUIRE semantics and
clear_bit_unlock() which has RELEASE semantics.

Since a platform only has a single means of achieving atomic operations
the same barriers as for atomic_t are used, see atomic_t.txt.

back to top