https://github.com/torvalds/linux
Revision b4749e96a4a872c2496602566f205547c4e3c950 authored by Joe Perches on 17 July 2015, 23:24:01 UTC, committed by Linus Torvalds on 17 July 2015, 23:39:53 UTC
Changes in ("checkpatch: categorize some long line length checks")
now erroneously reports long line defects in patch context.

Fix it.

Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
1 parent f2abeef
Raw File
Tip revision: b4749e96a4a872c2496602566f205547c4e3c950 authored by Joe Perches on 17 July 2015, 23:24:01 UTC
checkpatch: fix long line messages about patch context
Tip revision: b4749e9
bad_memory.txt
March 2008
Jan-Simon Moeller, dl9pf@gmx.de


How to deal with bad memory e.g. reported by memtest86+ ?
#########################################################

There are three possibilities I know of:

1) Reinsert/swap the memory modules

2) Buy new modules (best!) or try to exchange the memory
   if you have spare-parts

3) Use BadRAM or memmap

This Howto is about number 3) .


BadRAM
######
BadRAM is the actively developed and available as kernel-patch
here:  http://rick.vanrein.org/linux/badram/

For more details see the BadRAM documentation.

memmap
######

memmap is already in the kernel and usable as kernel-parameter at
boot-time.  Its syntax is slightly strange and you may need to
calculate the values by yourself!

Syntax to exclude a memory area (see kernel-parameters.txt for details):
memmap=<size>$<address>

Example: memtest86+ reported here errors at address 0x18691458, 0x18698424 and
         some others. All had 0x1869xxxx in common, so I chose a pattern of
         0x18690000,0xffff0000.

With the numbers of the example above:
memmap=64K$0x18690000
 or
memmap=0x10000$0x18690000

back to top