https://github.com/torvalds/linux
Revision b5a0e011329431b90d315eaf6ca5fdb41df7a117 authored by Alexander van Heukelum on 23 February 2008, 23:24:06 UTC, committed by Linus Torvalds on 24 February 2008, 01:13:24 UTC
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.meminit.text+0x649):
Section mismatch in reference from the
function free_area_init_core() to the function .init.text:setup_usemap()
The function __meminit free_area_init_core() references
a function __init setup_usemap().
If free_area_init_core is only used by setup_usemap then
annotate free_area_init_core with a matching annotation.

The warning is covers this stack of functions in mm/page_alloc.c:

alloc_bootmem_node must be marked __init.
alloc_bootmem_node is used by setup_usemap, if !SPARSEMEM.
(usemap_size is only used by setup_usemap, if !SPARSEMEM.)
setup_usemap is only used by free_area_init_core.
free_area_init_core is only used by free_area_init_node.

free_area_init_node is used by:
arch/alpha/mm/numa.c: __init paging_init()
arch/arm/mm/init.c: __init bootmem_init_node()
arch/avr32/mm/init.c: __init paging_init()
arch/cris/arch-v10/mm/init.c: __init paging_init()
arch/cris/arch-v32/mm/init.c: __init paging_init()
arch/m32r/mm/discontig.c: __init zone_sizes_init()
arch/m32r/mm/init.c: __init zone_sizes_init()
arch/m68k/mm/motorola.c: __init paging_init()
arch/m68k/mm/sun3mmu.c: __init paging_init()
arch/mips/sgi-ip27/ip27-memory.c: __init paging_init()
arch/parisc/mm/init.c: __init paging_init()
arch/sparc/mm/srmmu.c: __init srmmu_paging_init()
arch/sparc/mm/sun4c.c: __init sun4c_paging_init()
arch/sparc64/mm/init.c: __init paging_init()
mm/page_alloc.c: __init free_area_init_nodes()
mm/page_alloc.c: __init free_area_init()
and
mm/memory_hotplug.c: hotadd_new_pgdat()

hotadd_new_pgdat can not be an __init function, but:

It is compiled for MEMORY_HOTPLUG configurations only
MEMORY_HOTPLUG depends on SPARSEMEM || X86_64_ACPI_NUMA
X86_64_ACPI_NUMA depends on X86_64
ARCH_FLATMEM_ENABLE depends on X86_32
ARCH_DISCONTIGMEM_ENABLE depends on X86_32
So X86_64_ACPI_NUMA implies SPARSEMEM, right?

So we can mark the stack of functions __init for !SPARSEMEM, but we must mark
them __meminit for SPARSEMEM configurations.  This is ok, because then the
calls to alloc_bootmem_node are also avoided.

Compile-tested on:
silly minimal config
defconfig x86_32
defconfig x86_64
defconfig x86_64 -HIBERNATION +MEMORY_HOTPLUG

Signed-off-by: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@fastmail.fm>
Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
1 parent bcdca22
History
Tip revision: b5a0e011329431b90d315eaf6ca5fdb41df7a117 authored by Alexander van Heukelum on 23 February 2008, 23:24:06 UTC
Solve section mismatch for free_area_init_core.
Tip revision: b5a0e01
File Mode Size
Documentation
arch
block
crypto
drivers
fs
include
init
ipc
kernel
lib
mm
net
samples
scripts
security
sound
usr
virt
.gitignore -rw-r--r-- 636 bytes
.mailmap -rw-r--r-- 3.6 KB
COPYING -rw-r--r-- 18.3 KB
CREDITS -rw-r--r-- 90.4 KB
Kbuild -rw-r--r-- 1.6 KB
MAINTAINERS -rw-r--r-- 94.4 KB
Makefile -rw-r--r-- 52.8 KB
README -rw-r--r-- 16.5 KB
REPORTING-BUGS -rw-r--r-- 3.1 KB

README

back to top