Revision b5d281f6c16dd432b618bdfd36ddba1a58d5b603 authored by Christian Marangi on 19 June 2022, 22:03:51 UTC, committed by Chanwoo Choi on 29 June 2022, 20:11:17 UTC
On a devfreq PROBE_DEFER, the freq_table in the driver profile struct, is never reset and may be leaved in an undefined state. This comes from the fact that we store the freq_table in the driver profile struct that is commonly defined as static and not reset on PROBE_DEFER. We currently skip the reinit of the freq_table if we found it's already defined since a driver may declare his own freq_table. This logic is flawed in the case devfreq core generate a freq_table, set it in the profile struct and then PROBE_DEFER, freeing the freq_table. In this case devfreq will found a NOT NULL freq_table that has been freed, skip the freq_table generation and probe the driver based on the wrong table. To fix this and correctly handle PROBE_DEFER, use a local freq_table and max_state in the devfreq struct and never modify the freq_table present in the profile struct if it does provide it. Fixes: 0ec09ac2cebe ("PM / devfreq: Set the freq_table of devfreq device") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
1 parent f44b799
list_debug.c
/*
* Copyright 2006, Red Hat, Inc., Dave Jones
* Released under the General Public License (GPL).
*
* This file contains the linked list validation for DEBUG_LIST.
*/
#include <linux/export.h>
#include <linux/list.h>
#include <linux/bug.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/rculist.h>
/*
* Check that the data structures for the list manipulations are reasonably
* valid. Failures here indicate memory corruption (and possibly an exploit
* attempt).
*/
bool __list_add_valid(struct list_head *new, struct list_head *prev,
struct list_head *next)
{
if (CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(next->prev != prev,
"list_add corruption. next->prev should be prev (%px), but was %px. (next=%px).\n",
prev, next->prev, next) ||
CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(prev->next != next,
"list_add corruption. prev->next should be next (%px), but was %px. (prev=%px).\n",
next, prev->next, prev) ||
CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(new == prev || new == next,
"list_add double add: new=%px, prev=%px, next=%px.\n",
new, prev, next))
return false;
return true;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__list_add_valid);
bool __list_del_entry_valid(struct list_head *entry)
{
struct list_head *prev, *next;
prev = entry->prev;
next = entry->next;
if (CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(next == LIST_POISON1,
"list_del corruption, %px->next is LIST_POISON1 (%px)\n",
entry, LIST_POISON1) ||
CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(prev == LIST_POISON2,
"list_del corruption, %px->prev is LIST_POISON2 (%px)\n",
entry, LIST_POISON2) ||
CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(prev->next != entry,
"list_del corruption. prev->next should be %px, but was %px. (prev=%px)\n",
entry, prev->next, prev) ||
CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(next->prev != entry,
"list_del corruption. next->prev should be %px, but was %px. (next=%px)\n",
entry, next->prev, next))
return false;
return true;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__list_del_entry_valid);
Computing file changes ...