Revision be14eb619108fa8b7120eb2c42d66d5f623ae10e authored by Brian King on 10 September 2010, 07:03:21 UTC, committed by Jens Axboe on 10 September 2010, 07:03:21 UTC
While testing CPU DLPAR, the following problem was discovered. We were DLPAR removing the first CPU, which in this case was logical CPUs 0-3. CPUs 0-2 were already marked offline and we were in the process of offlining CPU 3. After marking the CPU inactive and offline in cpu_disable, but before the cpu was completely idle (cpu_die), we ended up in __make_request on CPU 3. There we looked at the topology map to see which CPU to complete the I/O on and found no CPUs in the cpu_sibling_map. This resulted in the block layer setting the completion cpu to be NR_CPUS, which then caused an oops when we tried to complete the I/O. Fix this by sanity checking the value we return from blk_cpu_to_group to be a valid cpu value. Signed-off-by: Brian King <brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
1 parent edce682
File | Mode | Size |
---|---|---|
Kconfig | -rw-r--r-- | 6.4 KB |
Makefile | -rw-r--r-- | 1.0 KB |
ip6_queue.c | -rw-r--r-- | 14.0 KB |
ip6_tables.c | -rw-r--r-- | 57.9 KB |
ip6t_LOG.c | -rw-r--r-- | 12.1 KB |
ip6t_REJECT.c | -rw-r--r-- | 6.6 KB |
ip6t_ah.c | -rw-r--r-- | 3.1 KB |
ip6t_eui64.c | -rw-r--r-- | 1.8 KB |
ip6t_frag.c | -rw-r--r-- | 3.9 KB |
ip6t_hbh.c | -rw-r--r-- | 5.0 KB |
ip6t_ipv6header.c | -rw-r--r-- | 3.5 KB |
ip6t_mh.c | -rw-r--r-- | 2.3 KB |
ip6t_rt.c | -rw-r--r-- | 5.8 KB |
ip6table_filter.c | -rw-r--r-- | 3.0 KB |
ip6table_mangle.c | -rw-r--r-- | 4.0 KB |
ip6table_raw.c | -rw-r--r-- | 2.1 KB |
ip6table_security.c | -rw-r--r-- | 2.8 KB |
nf_conntrack_l3proto_ipv6.c | -rw-r--r-- | 12.6 KB |
nf_conntrack_proto_icmpv6.c | -rw-r--r-- | 8.9 KB |
nf_conntrack_reasm.c | -rw-r--r-- | 16.3 KB |
![swh spinner](/static/img/swh-spinner.gif)
Computing file changes ...