Revision c0c1439541f5305b57a83d599af32b74182933fe authored by Oleg Nesterov on 23 December 2013, 22:45:01 UTC, committed by Paul Moore on 23 December 2013, 22:45:17 UTC
selinux_setprocattr() does ptrace_parent(p) under task_lock(p),
but task_struct->alloc_lock doesn't pin ->parent or ->ptrace,
this looks confusing and triggers the "suspicious RCU usage"
warning because ptrace_parent() does rcu_dereference_check().

And in theory this is wrong, spin_lock()->preempt_disable()
doesn't necessarily imply rcu_read_lock() we need to access
the ->parent.

Reported-by: Evan McNabb <emcnabb@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com>
1 parent 46d01d6
History
File Mode Size
Documentation
arch
block
crypto
drivers
firmware
fs
include
init
ipc
kernel
lib
mm
net
samples
scripts
security
sound
tools
usr
virt
.gitignore -rw-r--r-- 1.1 KB
.mailmap -rw-r--r-- 4.4 KB
COPYING -rw-r--r-- 18.3 KB
CREDITS -rw-r--r-- 93.3 KB
Kbuild -rw-r--r-- 2.5 KB
Kconfig -rw-r--r-- 252 bytes
MAINTAINERS -rw-r--r-- 262.2 KB
Makefile -rw-r--r-- 48.3 KB
README -rw-r--r-- 18.3 KB
REPORTING-BUGS -rw-r--r-- 7.3 KB

README

back to top