Revision e5ae1bb46564689e56a38f3509daffa4aca3b29c authored by Daniel Black on 27 June 2018, 19:09:50 UTC, committed by Facebook Github Bot on 27 June 2018, 19:23:07 UTC
Summary:
Various rearrangements of the cch maths failed or replacing = '\0' with
memset failed to convince the compiler it was nul terminated. So took
the perverse option of changing strncpy to strcpy.
Return null if memory couldn't be allocated.
util/status.cc: In static member function ‘static const char* rocksdb::Status::CopyState(const char*)’:
util/status.cc:28:15: error: ‘char* strncpy(char*, const char*, size_t)’ output truncated before terminating nul copying as many bytes from a string as its length [-Werror=stringop-truncation]
std::strncpy(result, state, cch - 1);
~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
util/status.cc:19:18: note: length computed here
std::strlen(state) + 1; // +1 for the null terminator
~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~
cc1plus: all warnings being treated as errors
make: *** [Makefile:645: shared-objects/util/status.o] Error 1
closes #2705
Closes https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/3870
Differential Revision: D8594114
Pulled By: anand1976
fbshipit-source-id: ab20f3a456a711e4d29144ebe630e4fe3c99ec25
1 parent a16e00b
ROCKSDB_LITE.md
# RocksDBLite
RocksDBLite is a project focused on mobile use cases, which don't need a lot of fancy things we've built for server workloads and they are very sensitive to binary size. For that reason, we added a compile flag ROCKSDB_LITE that comments out a lot of the nonessential code and keeps the binary lean.
Some examples of the features disabled by ROCKSDB_LITE:
* compiled-in support for LDB tool
* No backupable DB
* No support for replication (which we provide in form of TransactionalIterator)
* No advanced monitoring tools
* No special-purpose memtables that are highly optimized for specific use cases
* No Transactions
When adding a new big feature to RocksDB, please add ROCKSDB_LITE compile guard if:
* Nobody from mobile really needs your feature,
* Your feature is adding a lot of weight to the binary.
Don't add ROCKSDB_LITE compile guard if:
* It would introduce a lot of code complexity. Compile guards make code harder to read. It's a trade-off.
* Your feature is not adding a lot of weight.
If unsure, ask. :)
Computing file changes ...
