Revision e5dce96e9e26f8e30291c79fa5647313c64b2150 authored by Junio C Hamano on 21 September 2012, 19:09:42 UTC, committed by Junio C Hamano on 21 September 2012, 19:14:19 UTC
Make it clear to people who (rightly or wrongly) think that the "--follow" option should follow origin across while-file renames that we already do so. That would explain the output that they see when they do give the "--follow" option to the command. We may or may not want to do a "--no-follow" patch as a follow-up, but that is a separate topic. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
1 parent bafc478
t0005-signals.sh
#!/bin/sh
test_description='signals work as we expect'
. ./test-lib.sh
cat >expect <<EOF
three
two
one
EOF
test_expect_success 'sigchain works' '
test-sigchain >actual
case "$?" in
143) true ;; # POSIX w/ SIGTERM=15
271) true ;; # ksh w/ SIGTERM=15
3) true ;; # Windows
*) false ;;
esac &&
test_cmp expect actual
'
test_done
Computing file changes ...
