Revision e6838a29ecb484c97e4efef9429643b9851fba6e authored by J. Bruce Fields on 21 April 2017, 20:10:18 UTC, committed by J. Bruce Fields on 25 April 2017, 20:34:37 UTC
A client can append random data to the end of an NFSv2 or NFSv3 RPC call
without our complaining; we'll just stop parsing at the end of the
expected data and ignore the rest.

Encoded arguments and replies are stored together in an array of pages,
and if a call is too large it could leave inadequate space for the
reply.  This is normally OK because NFS RPC's typically have either
short arguments and long replies (like READ) or long arguments and short
replies (like WRITE).  But a client that sends an incorrectly long reply
can violate those assumptions.  This was observed to cause crashes.

Also, several operations increment rq_next_page in the decode routine
before checking the argument size, which can leave rq_next_page pointing
well past the end of the page array, causing trouble later in
svc_free_pages.

So, following a suggestion from Neil Brown, add a central check to
enforce our expectation that no NFSv2/v3 call has both a large call and
a large reply.

As followup we may also want to rewrite the encoding routines to check
more carefully that they aren't running off the end of the page array.

We may also consider rejecting calls that have any extra garbage
appended.  That would be safer, and within our rights by spec, but given
the age of our server and the NFS protocol, and the fact that we've
never enforced this before, we may need to balance that against the
possibility of breaking some oddball client.

Reported-by: Tuomas Haanpää <thaan@synopsys.com>
Reported-by: Ari Kauppi <ari@synopsys.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
1 parent 5a7ad11
Raw File
siphash.txt
         SipHash - a short input PRF
-----------------------------------------------
Written by Jason A. Donenfeld <jason@zx2c4.com>

SipHash is a cryptographically secure PRF -- a keyed hash function -- that
performs very well for short inputs, hence the name. It was designed by
cryptographers Daniel J. Bernstein and Jean-Philippe Aumasson. It is intended
as a replacement for some uses of: `jhash`, `md5_transform`, `sha_transform`,
and so forth.

SipHash takes a secret key filled with randomly generated numbers and either
an input buffer or several input integers. It spits out an integer that is
indistinguishable from random. You may then use that integer as part of secure
sequence numbers, secure cookies, or mask it off for use in a hash table.

1. Generating a key

Keys should always be generated from a cryptographically secure source of
random numbers, either using get_random_bytes or get_random_once:

siphash_key_t key;
get_random_bytes(&key, sizeof(key));

If you're not deriving your key from here, you're doing it wrong.

2. Using the functions

There are two variants of the function, one that takes a list of integers, and
one that takes a buffer:

u64 siphash(const void *data, size_t len, const siphash_key_t *key);

And:

u64 siphash_1u64(u64, const siphash_key_t *key);
u64 siphash_2u64(u64, u64, const siphash_key_t *key);
u64 siphash_3u64(u64, u64, u64, const siphash_key_t *key);
u64 siphash_4u64(u64, u64, u64, u64, const siphash_key_t *key);
u64 siphash_1u32(u32, const siphash_key_t *key);
u64 siphash_2u32(u32, u32, const siphash_key_t *key);
u64 siphash_3u32(u32, u32, u32, const siphash_key_t *key);
u64 siphash_4u32(u32, u32, u32, u32, const siphash_key_t *key);

If you pass the generic siphash function something of a constant length, it
will constant fold at compile-time and automatically choose one of the
optimized functions.

3. Hashtable key function usage:

struct some_hashtable {
	DECLARE_HASHTABLE(hashtable, 8);
	siphash_key_t key;
};

void init_hashtable(struct some_hashtable *table)
{
	get_random_bytes(&table->key, sizeof(table->key));
}

static inline hlist_head *some_hashtable_bucket(struct some_hashtable *table, struct interesting_input *input)
{
	return &table->hashtable[siphash(input, sizeof(*input), &table->key) & (HASH_SIZE(table->hashtable) - 1)];
}

You may then iterate like usual over the returned hash bucket.

4. Security

SipHash has a very high security margin, with its 128-bit key. So long as the
key is kept secret, it is impossible for an attacker to guess the outputs of
the function, even if being able to observe many outputs, since 2^128 outputs
is significant.

Linux implements the "2-4" variant of SipHash.

5. Struct-passing Pitfalls

Often times the XuY functions will not be large enough, and instead you'll
want to pass a pre-filled struct to siphash. When doing this, it's important
to always ensure the struct has no padding holes. The easiest way to do this
is to simply arrange the members of the struct in descending order of size,
and to use offsetendof() instead of sizeof() for getting the size. For
performance reasons, if possible, it's probably a good thing to align the
struct to the right boundary. Here's an example:

const struct {
	struct in6_addr saddr;
	u32 counter;
	u16 dport;
} __aligned(SIPHASH_ALIGNMENT) combined = {
	.saddr = *(struct in6_addr *)saddr,
	.counter = counter,
	.dport = dport
};
u64 h = siphash(&combined, offsetofend(typeof(combined), dport), &secret);

6. Resources

Read the SipHash paper if you're interested in learning more:
https://131002.net/siphash/siphash.pdf


~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~

HalfSipHash - SipHash's insecure younger cousin
-----------------------------------------------
Written by Jason A. Donenfeld <jason@zx2c4.com>

On the off-chance that SipHash is not fast enough for your needs, you might be
able to justify using HalfSipHash, a terrifying but potentially useful
possibility. HalfSipHash cuts SipHash's rounds down from "2-4" to "1-3" and,
even scarier, uses an easily brute-forcable 64-bit key (with a 32-bit output)
instead of SipHash's 128-bit key. However, this may appeal to some
high-performance `jhash` users.

Danger!

Do not ever use HalfSipHash except for as a hashtable key function, and only
then when you can be absolutely certain that the outputs will never be
transmitted out of the kernel. This is only remotely useful over `jhash` as a
means of mitigating hashtable flooding denial of service attacks.

1. Generating a key

Keys should always be generated from a cryptographically secure source of
random numbers, either using get_random_bytes or get_random_once:

hsiphash_key_t key;
get_random_bytes(&key, sizeof(key));

If you're not deriving your key from here, you're doing it wrong.

2. Using the functions

There are two variants of the function, one that takes a list of integers, and
one that takes a buffer:

u32 hsiphash(const void *data, size_t len, const hsiphash_key_t *key);

And:

u32 hsiphash_1u32(u32, const hsiphash_key_t *key);
u32 hsiphash_2u32(u32, u32, const hsiphash_key_t *key);
u32 hsiphash_3u32(u32, u32, u32, const hsiphash_key_t *key);
u32 hsiphash_4u32(u32, u32, u32, u32, const hsiphash_key_t *key);

If you pass the generic hsiphash function something of a constant length, it
will constant fold at compile-time and automatically choose one of the
optimized functions.

3. Hashtable key function usage:

struct some_hashtable {
	DECLARE_HASHTABLE(hashtable, 8);
	hsiphash_key_t key;
};

void init_hashtable(struct some_hashtable *table)
{
	get_random_bytes(&table->key, sizeof(table->key));
}

static inline hlist_head *some_hashtable_bucket(struct some_hashtable *table, struct interesting_input *input)
{
	return &table->hashtable[hsiphash(input, sizeof(*input), &table->key) & (HASH_SIZE(table->hashtable) - 1)];
}

You may then iterate like usual over the returned hash bucket.

4. Performance

HalfSipHash is roughly 3 times slower than JenkinsHash. For many replacements,
this will not be a problem, as the hashtable lookup isn't the bottleneck. And
in general, this is probably a good sacrifice to make for the security and DoS
resistance of HalfSipHash.
back to top