Revision e91467ecd1ef381377fd327c0ded922835ec52ab authored by Christian Borntraeger on 05 August 2006, 19:13:52 UTC, committed by Linus Torvalds on 06 August 2006, 15:57:46 UTC
This patch adds a barrier() in futex unqueue_me to avoid aliasing of two
pointers.
On my s390x system I saw the following oops:
Unable to handle kernel pointer dereference at virtual kernel address
0000000000000000
Oops: 0004 [#1]
CPU: 0 Not tainted
Process mytool (pid: 13613, task: 000000003ecb6ac0, ksp: 00000000366bdbd8)
Krnl PSW : 0704d00180000000 00000000003c9ac2 (_spin_lock+0xe/0x30)
Krnl GPRS: 00000000ffffffff 000000003ecb6ac0 0000000000000000 0700000000000000
0000000000000000 0000000000000000 000001fe00002028 00000000000c091f
000001fe00002054 000001fe00002054 0000000000000000 00000000366bddc0
00000000005ef8c0 00000000003d00e8 0000000000144f91 00000000366bdcb8
Krnl Code: ba 4e 20 00 12 44 b9 16 00 3e a7 84 00 08 e3 e0 f0 88 00 04
Call Trace:
([<0000000000144f90>] unqueue_me+0x40/0xe4)
[<0000000000145a0c>] do_futex+0x33c/0xc40
[<000000000014643e>] sys_futex+0x12e/0x144
[<000000000010bb00>] sysc_noemu+0x10/0x16
[<000002000003741c>] 0x2000003741c
The code in question is:
static int unqueue_me(struct futex_q *q)
{
int ret = 0;
spinlock_t *lock_ptr;
/* In the common case we don't take the spinlock, which is nice. */
retry:
lock_ptr = q->lock_ptr;
if (lock_ptr != 0) {
spin_lock(lock_ptr);
/*
* q->lock_ptr can change between reading it and
* spin_lock(), causing us to take the wrong lock. This
* corrects the race condition.
[...]
and my compiler (gcc 4.1.0) makes the following out of it:
00000000000003c8 <unqueue_me>:
3c8: eb bf f0 70 00 24 stmg %r11,%r15,112(%r15)
3ce: c0 d0 00 00 00 00 larl %r13,3ce <unqueue_me+0x6>
3d0: R_390_PC32DBL .rodata+0x2a
3d4: a7 f1 1e 00 tml %r15,7680
3d8: a7 84 00 01 je 3da <unqueue_me+0x12>
3dc: b9 04 00 ef lgr %r14,%r15
3e0: a7 fb ff d0 aghi %r15,-48
3e4: b9 04 00 b2 lgr %r11,%r2
3e8: e3 e0 f0 98 00 24 stg %r14,152(%r15)
3ee: e3 c0 b0 28 00 04 lg %r12,40(%r11)
/* write q->lock_ptr in r12 */
3f4: b9 02 00 cc ltgr %r12,%r12
3f8: a7 84 00 4b je 48e <unqueue_me+0xc6>
/* if r12 is zero then jump over the code.... */
3fc: e3 20 b0 28 00 04 lg %r2,40(%r11)
/* write q->lock_ptr in r2 */
402: c0 e5 00 00 00 00 brasl %r14,402 <unqueue_me+0x3a>
404: R_390_PC32DBL _spin_lock+0x2
/* use r2 as parameter for spin_lock */
So the code becomes more or less:
if (q->lock_ptr != 0) spin_lock(q->lock_ptr)
instead of
if (lock_ptr != 0) spin_lock(lock_ptr)
Which caused the oops from above.
After adding a barrier gcc creates code without this problem:
[...] (the same)
3ee: e3 c0 b0 28 00 04 lg %r12,40(%r11)
3f4: b9 02 00 cc ltgr %r12,%r12
3f8: b9 04 00 2c lgr %r2,%r12
3fc: a7 84 00 48 je 48c <unqueue_me+0xc4>
400: c0 e5 00 00 00 00 brasl %r14,400 <unqueue_me+0x38>
402: R_390_PC32DBL _spin_lock+0x2
As a general note, this code of unqueue_me seems a bit fishy. The retry logic
of unqueue_me only works if we can guarantee, that the original value of
q->lock_ptr is always a spinlock (Otherwise we overwrite kernel memory). We
know that q->lock_ptr can change. I dont know what happens with the original
spinlock, as I am not an expert with the futex code.
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@timesys.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntrae@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
1 parent 72f0b4e
ptrace.h
#ifndef _ASMAXP_PTRACE_H
#define _ASMAXP_PTRACE_H
/*
* This struct defines the way the registers are stored on the
* kernel stack during a system call or other kernel entry
*
* NOTE! I want to minimize the overhead of system calls, so this
* struct has as little information as possible. I does not have
*
* - floating point regs: the kernel doesn't change those
* - r9-15: saved by the C compiler
*
* This makes "fork()" and "exec()" a bit more complex, but should
* give us low system call latency.
*/
struct pt_regs {
unsigned long r0;
unsigned long r1;
unsigned long r2;
unsigned long r3;
unsigned long r4;
unsigned long r5;
unsigned long r6;
unsigned long r7;
unsigned long r8;
unsigned long r19;
unsigned long r20;
unsigned long r21;
unsigned long r22;
unsigned long r23;
unsigned long r24;
unsigned long r25;
unsigned long r26;
unsigned long r27;
unsigned long r28;
unsigned long hae;
/* JRP - These are the values provided to a0-a2 by PALcode */
unsigned long trap_a0;
unsigned long trap_a1;
unsigned long trap_a2;
/* These are saved by PAL-code: */
unsigned long ps;
unsigned long pc;
unsigned long gp;
unsigned long r16;
unsigned long r17;
unsigned long r18;
};
/*
* This is the extended stack used by signal handlers and the context
* switcher: it's pushed after the normal "struct pt_regs".
*/
struct switch_stack {
unsigned long r9;
unsigned long r10;
unsigned long r11;
unsigned long r12;
unsigned long r13;
unsigned long r14;
unsigned long r15;
unsigned long r26;
unsigned long fp[32]; /* fp[31] is fpcr */
};
#ifdef __KERNEL__
#define __ARCH_SYS_PTRACE 1
#define user_mode(regs) (((regs)->ps & 8) != 0)
#define instruction_pointer(regs) ((regs)->pc)
#define profile_pc(regs) instruction_pointer(regs)
extern void show_regs(struct pt_regs *);
#define task_pt_regs(task) \
((struct pt_regs *) (task_stack_page(task) + 2*PAGE_SIZE) - 1)
#define force_successful_syscall_return() (task_pt_regs(current)->r0 = 0)
#endif
#endif
Computing file changes ...
